Understanding the False Statement (tan X)(cos X) = (sin X) in Trigonometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Short Trig
AI Thread Summary
The equation (tan X)(cos X) = (sin X) is false because tan X is defined as sin X/cos X, and when cos X equals zero, tan X becomes undefined. This occurs at specific angles, such as π/2, where sin(π/2) equals 1, but tan(π/2) is undefined due to the zero denominator. Therefore, multiplying tan X by cos X does not yield sin X when tan X is undefined. The key takeaway is that the equality fails at points where the tangent function is undefined, leading to an undefined result overall. Understanding these conditions is crucial in trigonometry.
dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
how is (tan X)(cos X) = (sin X) false?

tan is sin/cos so when you multiply by cos, you get sin...yet the answer i was given was false? how so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dnt said:
how is (tan X)(cos X) = (sin X) false?
tan is sin/cos so when you multiply by cos, you get sin...yet the answer i was given was false? how so?
Well,
\sin \frac{\pi}{2}=1
while
\tan \frac{\pi}{2}
is undefined.
 
NateTG said:
Well,
\sin \frac{\pi}{2}=1
while
\tan \frac{\pi}{2}
is undefined.
tan\frac{\pi}{2} is undefined because cos\frac{\pi}{2} is zero.
but that did not answer his question.
The answer is that (tan x)(cos x) is not equal to sin x because when tan x is undefined, the denominator of the trigonometric fraction \frac{sin x}{cos x} is zero and when you have a zero denominator, multiplying by zero in the numerator still results in an undefined result.
 
Last edited:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top