Understanding the Formula r=mv/Bq in Grade 12 Physics

AI Thread Summary
The formula r=mv/Bq is derived from the relationship between magnetic force and centripetal force in uniform circular motion. When a charged particle moves perpendicular to a magnetic field, the magnetic force acting on it can be expressed as F=qvB. This force equals the centripetal force required for circular motion, F=ma, leading to the equation qvB=ma. By substituting the expressions for velocity and acceleration, the formula simplifies to r=mv/Bq. Understanding this derivation is crucial for grasping concepts in grade 12 physics.
mayodt
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Where did the formula r=mv/Bq come from in my answerbook for my grade 12 physics? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mayodt said:
Where did the formula r=mv/Bq come from in my answerbook for my grade 12 physics? Thanks.

Do you know the equation for uniform circular motion, given a force F that always points toward the center of the circular motion?

Do you know the equation for the force F on a charged particle q when it is traveling at velocity v perpendicular to a magnetic field B?
 
berkeman said:
Do you know the equation for uniform circular motion, given a force F that always points toward the center of the circular motion?

Do you know the equation for the force F on a charged particle q when it is traveling at velocity v perpendicular to a magnetic field B?

F=qvBsin(theta) is the equation right? and, I probably have seen the first one, but can't remember that specific one.
 
mayodt said:
F=qvBsin(theta) is the equation right?

Correct, but what does it simplify to when the velocity and B-field are orthogonal (at right angles to each other)?


mayodt said:
and, I probably have seen the first one, but can't remember that specific one.

See Uniform Circular Motion at wikipedia, and remember that F=ma:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_circular_motion

.
 
berkeman said:
Correct, but what does it simplify to when the velocity and B-field are orthogonal (at right angles to each other)?




See Uniform Circular Motion at wikipedia, and remember that F=ma:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_circular_motion

.

Ohh okay I got it. Because the force of the magnetic field equals the net force (F=ma) so that means that qvb=ma and then since v=rw and a=vw it's qrwB=mvw, and then the w's cancel out and you rearrange. Thanks a lot :biggrin:
 
mayodt said:
Ohh okay I got it. Because the force of the magnetic field equals the net force (F=ma) so that means that qvb=ma and then since v=rw and a=vw it's qrwB=mvw, and then the w's cancel out and you rearrange. Thanks a lot :biggrin:

Good job! :biggrin:
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top