Understanding the Impact of Reduced Air Resistance on Object Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
When the force of air resistance on an object is reduced by a factor of four, the net force acting on the object becomes 3/4F, leading to acceleration. Initially, at constant velocity, the thrust force equals the air resistance. With the reduction in air resistance, the thrust force exceeds the new resistance, resulting in a net force that causes acceleration. This situation illustrates Newton's second law, where the net force is the difference between thrust and reduced resistance. Consequently, the object accelerates due to the imbalance created by the decreased air resistance.
jerryez
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
If F is the force of air resistance on an object with mass m moving at a constant velocity, which of the following best describes the acceleration of the object when the force of air resistance is reduced by a factor of 4?



F=ma


It says the answer is equal to (3/4)F/m = a

Can someone explain why its the 3/4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is an application of Newton's 2nd law.

Write down the sum of all forces in the case where an object is moving at constant velocity:

\sum F = F_{\mathrm{thrust}} - F_{\mathrm{res}} = 0,

i.e. the object is not accelerating or decelerating, thus the thrust must equal the wind resistance. Now write down the sum of all forces when the resistance force suddenly drops by 1/4:

\sum F = ma = F_{\mathrm{thrust}} - F_{\mathrm{res}}/4.

The thrust force remains the same as before which was equal to the old wind resistance, however the resistance has now dropped a quarter meaning the thrust is more powerful than the new wind resistance which results in an acceleration. From the first part you have that F_{\mathrm{thrust}} = F_{\mathrm{res}}, so plugging this into the second part yields the result.
 
So, qualitatively speaking:
resisting force = driving force since its at constant velocity, right?
so if the resisting dropped from F to 1/4F... then the net force would be 3/4F in favour of the driving force. ...which means the object is accelerating.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top