Understanding the Minimum Thickness for Preventing Overturning in Concrete Dams

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Failure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the minimum thickness required for a freestanding concrete dam to prevent overturning due to water pressure. Overturning refers to the dam toppling over, which is influenced by the torque created by the water's force. Initially, there was confusion about the relevance of thickness when it was already provided, but it was clarified that thickness is a variable in the context of stability. The correct formula derived for the minimum thickness is t > √(ρ_w / (3ρ_c))h, where ρ_w is the density of water and ρ_c is the density of concrete. This highlights the importance of both material densities in assessing the dam's structural integrity against overturning.
e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding this question:

For a freestanding concrete dam of uniform thickness t and height h, what minimum thickness is needed to prevent overturning? Do you need to add in atmospheric pressure for this last part? Explain.

What do they mean by overturning exactly? And why would I need to find the thickness when I'm already given the thickness?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the face of it, this looks like a question about buckling strength, but I'm not too sure..
 
e(ho0n3 said:
What do they mean by overturning exactly?
I presume "overturn" means just what it sounds like it means: knock over, topple.

When full, the water exerts a force on the dam. Is it enough to topple the dam? Think of the dam as a solid block. (Consider torques.)
And why would I need to find the thickness when I'm already given the thickness?
The thickness is a variable.

An interesting problem.
 
OK. I found the force of the water on the dam and where it acts. What I then did was, I calculated the torque about the tipping edge (assumming the block is already in tipped state) and set this greater than zero. Solving for t, I obtained

t > \sqrt{h/3}

Am I correct?
 
e(ho0n3 said:
t > \sqrt{h/3}

Am I correct?
Don't you find it odd that your answer shows no dependence on the mass of the dam or the density of the water?
 
That and the units don't make any sense. Hmm...What to do?
 
OK. I made some dumb mistakes but now I have the answer, which is

t > \sqrt{\frac{\rho_w}{3\rho_c}}h

where \rho_w is the density of water and \rho_c is the density of concrete.
 
Last edited:
Now you got it. :approve:
 
Back
Top