Understanding the Need to Change π3 to π3' in Buckingham Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter welovephysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the necessity of changing π3 to π3', the inverse of the Reynolds number, in the context of the Buckingham theorem. One participant questions whether this change alters the original relationship expressed as π1 = f(π2, π3), arguing that it should remain unchanged. Another contributor clarifies that π1 can still be a function of π2 and π3', as it represents a different function. However, they express skepticism about the benefits of making this switch. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the flexibility in defining functions within the theorem while questioning the practical implications of such changes.
welovephysics
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


why there is a need to change π3 to π3 ' (which is inverse of reynold number)? (in 2nd picture)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


why can we do so ? i was told that π1 = f( π2 , π3 , ...)
if we use π3' , which is this will change the original meaning of π1 = f( π2 , π3 , ...) , am i right ? IMO, this is wrong , there's no need to change π1 = f( π2 , π3 , ...) 3 to π1 = f( π2 , π3 , ...) 3 ' ...
can someone explain on it ?
[/B]
 

Attachments

  • 197.PNG
    197.PNG
    25.4 KB · Views: 437
  • 198.PNG
    198.PNG
    51.1 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
If π1 is a function of π2 and π3 then it is also true that it is a function of π2 and π3-1. It's just a different function.
Until you have locked in how f is defined, you are free to choose how to define it.
That said, I don't see the advantage here in switching from π3 to π3-1.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top