Understanding the Path of Radio Waves (particularly 900 MHz & 2.4 GHz)

AI Thread Summary
Understanding radio wave propagation, particularly for 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz, involves recognizing how waves interact with various materials, including absorption by metal and water, and reflection off surfaces. The ability to predict whether waves will reflect or pass through objects depends on the material properties, which can be modeled using electromagnetic theory, though real-world applications are complicated due to numerous obstacles. Approximate models, like the COST 231 model, are often used to estimate propagation in different environments, such as urban or rural settings. Multipath fading occurs when multiple waves interfere due to reflections, leading to time-varying signal quality in mobile communications. For practical applications, using propagation prediction software is recommended for accurate assessments.
Underhill
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm interested in how to understand exactly how radio waves will propagate in a particular situation. I know that they are absorbed by metal and water, pass through other materials albeit with loss of power, and reflect or bounce off of surfaces as well.

How do I know whether a radio wave will reflect off of something or not? How do I know, for either a LOS or NLOS link, how much of the waves that reach the target have (1) reflected off of surfaces or (2) traveled straight through the air or (3) traveled straight through objects (e.g., walls)?

I am specifically interested in the propagation of 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz radio waves.

(Or should this question be posted in a Physics forum?)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


This is a complicated subject. It is possible to model transmission through a material, and reflections from it, using electromagnetic theory--if you know the material properties (complex permitivity, and magnetic permeability). Diffraction around edges is also important, and much harder to solve for exactly. In the real world, such modeling is nearly impossible due to the huge number of surfaces (buildings, hills, roads) and other obstacles such as trees.

As a result, approximate models geared toward the general environment (rural, suburban or urban) are used. One of the most common is the COST 231 model, but you can search on "mobile propagation channel models" to find many more.

A result of reflections is multipath fading--that is, multiple waves traveling different path lengths interfere constructively and destructively. For mobile communications, the result is time-varying signal fading. You can search Rayleigh fading and Rician fading to learn more.
 


Unless you are working on a thesis or dissertation your best bet would be to find a propagation prediction program. Have you done any internet searches for propagation prediction software?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top