Understanding the Technology Behind Touch Screens

  • Thread starter Thread starter fargoth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
Touch screen technology primarily utilizes Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) as a transparent conductor, allowing for the detection of touch through changes in resistance or capacitance between two ITO layers separated by tiny spacers. When a finger touches the screen, it alters the connection between these layers, enabling the mapping of coordinates based on the grid of electrodes. The discussion highlights the importance of using multiple conductors for accurate coordinate detection, typically employing four injecting and four receiving conductors for precision. Concerns about the rising prices of indium due to its widespread use in devices like phones and ATMs are also noted. Overall, understanding the electrical properties and configurations of these layers is crucial for grasping how touch screens function.
fargoth
Messages
318
Reaction score
6
ok, I've searched google and howstuffworks for it so far...
the explanations I am getting are too fuzzy, i don't understand how the X-Y coordinates are determined through each mechanism (ive read so far about resistive, capacitive and acoustic).

can anyone here give me a reference or a thorough explanation about this technology?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've seen touch screens that have light beams from an array of leds to photo-detectors that the finger breaks.

Regards
 
By far the most common technology is Indium Tin Oxide (ITO). ITO is a transparent conductor. This allows a thin film of it to be applied to a glass surface (say a screen) but still allow the image to transmit through. The typical installation consists of two ITO films separatated by tiny bumps that act as spacers. When you press the screen, you alter the connection between the two layers which is measured via a resistance or capacitance change. The electrodes are organized in some sort of grid so that coordinates can be communicated and mapped to the underlying image.

ITO is everywhere, in Palm Pilots, phones, ATMs, etc and it's widespread use has driven indium prices up sharply. There is even some mild concern that the world could run low on indium.
 
thank you all very much, i'll hunt for books next week and ask more specific questions.

meanwhile i want to ask this one:
i understand there is a voltage gradient between the two layers of indium so that when they touch charges move off of one to the other.
now, how i understand it, the layers are connected to electrodes (say from the top and from the left), so if id touch the top-right corner id get the strongest current from the right part of the top array of electordes and from the top part of the left array of electrodes, and that's how the screen knows i touched the top-right corner, am i right?

im having difficulties imagening it, because i thought the current should be the same from all directions toward the point where the layers touch... hmm as i write this i think i realized that my imagination may be true for vacuum, but when traveling inside a conductor the current is not the same for every path because the resistance of each path is different.

i really shouldn't post when I am tired... hope i don't sound too confused :biggrin:
 
In that example, you would typically have 4 injecting conductors (one along each edge of one ITO layer) and 4 receiving conductors (one along each edge of the other ITO layer). You would time multiplex resistance measurements between different source and receiving conductors to figure out the coordinates of the cross-over connection between the two resistive layers. You can probably do it with just 2 conductors per sheet, placed along adjacent edges on one sheet, and the opposite adjacent edges on the other sheet. But that wouldn't be as accurate as using 4 conductors per sheet...
 
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top