Understanding the Transition to Solve for t in an Oscillation Function

Mynona
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a cosine function, namely the function for oscillation x=A cos(wt).

I want to separate the t out here, so I can solve for it. My teacher gave the the answer to be t= (arccos (x/a)/2pi)*T, but I can't quite see where he came up with that. Would anyone be as kind as to give me a more elaborate explanation of how this transition was made.


(2pi and T comes from w=2pi/T).

Sorry for bad English, not a native English speaker obviously :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The inverse function of the cosine is the arc cosine. If a function f(x) has an inverse f^{-1}(x) then f^{-1}(f(x))=f(f^{-1}(x))=x.

Divide the equation on both sides by A then take the arccos on both sides. Can you calculate \arccos(\cos(\omega t))now?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top