parton
- 79
- 1
Hi all,
I am just reading Srednicki, chapter 88: The Standard Model: Lepton Sector
and I'm not sure if I really understand it.
There are left-handed Weyl fields
l, \overline{e}, \varphi
in the (SU(2), U(1)) representations
(2, -1/2), (1,1), (2, -1/2)
Now there is also a Yukawa term of the form
\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = - y \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.}
but I don't understand where this minus sign comes from.
I have the following guess: I could also write this term in the form:
\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = y \varphi^{j} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.}
Using \varphi^{j} l_{j} = \varepsilon^{ji} \varphi_{i} l_{j} = - \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j}
we obtain the Yukawa term above with the minus sign.
But if this is really right, \varphi^{i} would be in the (\overline{2}, -1/2) representation, which is equivalent to (2,-1/2)
But is the U(1) quantum number -1/2 uneffected by raising or lowering the index (it is just an SU(2) index, isn't it?) ?
This number would only change, if we consider the Hermitian adjoint,
(\varphi_{i})^{\dagger} = \varphi^{\dagger} \, ^{i} which would be in the representation
(2, +1/2)
I hope someone could tell whether my thoughts are right or wrong.
Thanks in advance :)
I am just reading Srednicki, chapter 88: The Standard Model: Lepton Sector
and I'm not sure if I really understand it.
There are left-handed Weyl fields
l, \overline{e}, \varphi
in the (SU(2), U(1)) representations
(2, -1/2), (1,1), (2, -1/2)
Now there is also a Yukawa term of the form
\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = - y \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.}
but I don't understand where this minus sign comes from.
I have the following guess: I could also write this term in the form:
\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = y \varphi^{j} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.}
Using \varphi^{j} l_{j} = \varepsilon^{ji} \varphi_{i} l_{j} = - \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j}
we obtain the Yukawa term above with the minus sign.
But if this is really right, \varphi^{i} would be in the (\overline{2}, -1/2) representation, which is equivalent to (2,-1/2)
But is the U(1) quantum number -1/2 uneffected by raising or lowering the index (it is just an SU(2) index, isn't it?) ?
This number would only change, if we consider the Hermitian adjoint,
(\varphi_{i})^{\dagger} = \varphi^{\dagger} \, ^{i} which would be in the representation
(2, +1/2)
I hope someone could tell whether my thoughts are right or wrong.
Thanks in advance :)