Understanding the Yukawa Term in Srednicki's Lepton Sector

  • Thread starter Thread starter parton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lepton Srednicki
parton
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I am just reading Srednicki, chapter 88: The Standard Model: Lepton Sector
and I'm not sure if I really understand it.

There are left-handed Weyl fields
l, \overline{e}, \varphi

in the (SU(2), U(1)) representations
(2, -1/2), (1,1), (2, -1/2)

Now there is also a Yukawa term of the form
\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = - y \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.}

but I don't understand where this minus sign comes from.

I have the following guess: I could also write this term in the form:
\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = y \varphi^{j} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.}

Using \varphi^{j} l_{j} = \varepsilon^{ji} \varphi_{i} l_{j} = - \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j}

we obtain the Yukawa term above with the minus sign.

But if this is really right, \varphi^{i} would be in the (\overline{2}, -1/2) representation, which is equivalent to (2,-1/2)

But is the U(1) quantum number -1/2 uneffected by raising or lowering the index (it is just an SU(2) index, isn't it?) ?
This number would only change, if we consider the Hermitian adjoint,
(\varphi_{i})^{\dagger} = \varphi^{\dagger} \, ^{i} which would be in the representation
(2, +1/2)

I hope someone could tell whether my thoughts are right or wrong.

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure if I understand what you mean. The Yukawa coupling constant is just an arbitrary number at this point, it does not matter which sign it has. Its not like the kinetic terms where the prefactor has a specific fixed value. The Yukawa interaction is parameterized by one parameter, you can choose a way to write it. This changes as soon as the Higgs field acquires a vacuum expectation value, because then you can identify the Yukawa coupling y with something like fermion mass over Higgs vev, both well measured quantities. Then you have to care about which sign your mass has, and choose the sign of the Yukawa coupling constant accordingly.

Hope these ramblings help...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top