Understanding Transformer Output Current: Ohm's Law vs. Transformer Losses

AI Thread Summary
In transformers, stepping up voltage results in reduced current, while stepping down voltage increases current, consistent with the power equation P=VI. The open-circuit output voltage is determined by the turns ratio and source voltage, with output current being zero until a load is applied. Once a load is connected, the output current must account for source impedance and transformer losses, which can reduce the current below ideal values. Ohm's Law (V=IR) remains applicable on the secondary side, but voltage drops due to source impedance and winding resistance affect the actual output. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between voltage, current, and transformer performance.
spidey
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
so in transformer if we step up voltage,current is reduced and if we step down, current is increased based on p=vi...but based on ohm's law v=ir..so we step up,current should be increasing and and if we step down, current is decreasing right ..which formula is correct?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
They are both correct. You are simply applying one of them wrong.
 
spidey said:
so in transformer if we step up voltage,current is reduced and if we step down, current is increased based on p=vi...but based on ohm's law v=ir..so we step up,current should be increasing and and if we step down, current is decreasing right ..which formula is correct?

The open-circuit output voltage of a transformer depends on the turns ratio and the source voltage amplitude. The output current is zero in the open-circuit case.

Once you add a load resistance to the secondary of the transformer, then things change. You need to account for the source impedance and the current in the load resistance, before you can say what the current is. If the transformer were lossless, and the source impedance negligible, then yes, the secondary current is Np/Ns multiplied by the primary current (since there is no power loss in the ideal transformer). But when there are transformer losses, and when the source impedance of the driving voltage source is not negligible, then the output current is less than the ideal value.

V=IR will always hold for the secondary side, but the voltage that you are getting will be pulled down from the source's open-circuit voltage level, due to the drop across the source impedance and due to transformer losses (like voltage drop across the winding resistances).

Does that help?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer

.
 
berkeman said:
The open-circuit output voltage of a transformer depends on the turns ratio and the source voltage amplitude. The output current is zero in the open-circuit case.

Once you add a load resistance to the secondary of the transformer, then things change. You need to account for the source impedance and the current in the load resistance, before you can say what the current is. If the transformer were lossless, and the source impedance negligible, then yes, the secondary current is Np/Ns multiplied by the primary current (since there is no power loss in the ideal transformer). But when there are transformer losses, and when the source impedance of the driving voltage source is not negligible, then the output current is less than the ideal value.

V=IR will always hold for the secondary side, but the voltage that you are getting will be pulled down from the source's open-circuit voltage level, due to the drop across the source impedance and due to transformer losses (like voltage drop across the winding resistances).

Does that help?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer

.

Thanks for the info...
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top