Understanding Ultimate Ratio of Equality

  • Thread starter Thread starter adiputra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two main topics: the ultimate ratio of equality and the application of Newton's second law, F=ma. The ultimate ratio of equality involves understanding how two quantities, when divided into parts and manipulated, maintain a consistent ratio as their magnitudes change infinitely. For the second point, the acceleration of a ball under the influence of force is contingent upon the continuous application of that force; without ongoing force, the ball will not accelerate indefinitely. Clarification on the lemma and visual aids for the first topic is requested, while a deeper examination of force application is suggested for the second. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the underlying principles of physics and mathematics.
adiputra
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
hi,
1)can anyone help me to understand ultimate ratio of equality? (from this extract)

Cor. Hence if two quantities of any kind are any how divided into an equal number of parts, and those parts, when their number is augmented, and their magnitude diminished in infinitum, have a given ratio one to the other, the first to the first, the second to the second, and so on in order, the whole, quantities will be one to the other in that same given ratio. For if, in the figures of this Lemma, the parallelograms are taken one to the other in the ratio of the parts, the sum of the parts will always be as the sum of the parallelograms; and therefore supposing the number of the parallelograms and parts to be augmented, and their magnitudes diminished in infinitum, those sums will be in the ultimate ratio of the parallelogram in the one figure to the correspondent parallelogram in the other; that is (by the supposition), in the ultimate ratio of any part of the one quantity to the correspondent part of the other.

2)if you are throwing a ball in a space and under equation F=ma, will the ball keep accelerating or it will accelerate for a momentary?



(sorry my english is very poor)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (1) it would help to have the lemma and the pictures if you could.

For (2) you should take a closer look at the equation F=ma. What is necessary to cause an acceleration? How do you apply such a thing?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top