Understanding Vector Components: Explaining an Inclined Plane Physics Question

AI Thread Summary
Understanding vector components in physics requires clarity on angle measurement. When breaking down a force vector, sine and cosine functions are associated with the y-axis and x-axis, respectively, but this depends on whether the angle is measured from the x-axis or y-axis. If the angle is from the x-axis, the relationships mg cos theta = ma sub x and mg sin theta = ma sub y are correct. To avoid confusion, it's recommended to use standard angle measurement where the positive x-axis is zero, ensuring consistent associations of cosine with x and sine with y. This approach simplifies the understanding of vector components in inclined plane problems.
micaele
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
So I was watching some of those physics videos posted in schoolwork board, and although he probably didn't make an error here, I don't think I understand it.

Here's the pictues. I'll elaborate after it so you guys know what I'm talking about:

http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/6632/88907417sb7.png When he broke the downward mg force into its components (mg cos theta = ma sub x and mg sin theta = ma sub y), shouldn't it be mg sin theta instead, and likewise for the other? I thought that when you break a vector into its parts, sine is associated with the y-axis and cosine for the x.

Maybe I'm having a brain fart, but I swear I had those vector components figured out.

Thanks ahead of time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Draw a picture and work out the geometery. Your understanding of sin and cos is fundamentally wrong.

see "Right triangle definitions"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_function

Hopefully, you can work that out for yourself given the link.
 
micaele said:
I thought that when you break a vector into its parts, sine is associated with the y-axis and cosine for the x.

It depends on whether the angle is measured from the x-axis or from the y-axis. If the angle is measured from the x-axis, what you wrote is correct. If the angle is measured from the y-axis, it's the other way around.
 
jtbell said:
It depends on whether the angle is measured from the x-axis or from the y-axis. If the angle is measured from the x-axis, what you wrote is correct. If the angle is measured from the y-axis, it's the other way around.

THAT'S the reason!

Thank you, that completely did not occur to me. I understand now, thanks.
 
One of the easiest (not fastest) ways to avoid this difficulty is to always use standard angle measurement (where the + x-axis is 0). Then x is always associated with cos and y is always associated with sin and the +s and -s take care of themselves.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top