Understanding Vector Transformations: Problem 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter jellicorse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planes Vector
jellicorse
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to follow an introductory problem in my book for which no solutions are provided and have got stuck. I was wondering whether anyone could tell me how to go about this problem and where I am going wrong.

The problem starts:

Consider the eqquations:
y_1= x_1+2x_2
y_2=3x_2

We can view these equations as describing a transformation of the vector x = \begin{bmatrix}x_1\\x_2\end{bmatrix} into the vector y = \begin{bmatrix}y_1\\y_2\end{bmatrix}

The transformation can be re-written as:

\begin{bmatrix}y_1\\y_2\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}1 & 2\\0 & 3\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x_1\\x_2\end{bmatrix}

Or, more succinctly, y=Fx


Problem 1: Compute Fx For the following vectors x:

a) x=\begin{bmatrix}1\\1\end{bmatrix} b) x=\begin{bmatrix}1\\-1\end{bmatrix} c) x=\begin{bmatrix}-1\\-1\end{bmatrix} d) x=\begin{bmatrix}-1\\1\end{bmatrix}


My Results:

a) Fx=\begin{bmatrix}3\\3\end{bmatrix} b) Fx=\begin{bmatrix}-1\\-3\end{bmatrix} c) Fx=\begin{bmatrix}-3\\-3\end{bmatrix} a) Fx=\begin{bmatrix}-1\\3\end{bmatrix}


This is where I am unsure. The next step says "The heads of the four vectors x in problem 1 locate the four corners of a square in the x_1x_2 plane."

I'm not sure I understand this: what does the " x_1x_2 plane" mean? I would have thought it means a plane in which x_1 and x_2 are the axes... But I can't see how this can work as x_1 just consists of the points 3, -1,-3 and 1 on the x axis, as far as I can see...

I'd be very grateful if anyone could indicate where I'm going wrong..!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x_1 and x_2 refer to your original vectors. The 4 points are (\pm 1, \pm 1); these are the corners of a square.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
OK, thanks Chogg...
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top