Understanding Weinberg's Symmetries and Rays

  • Thread starter Thread starter emma83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rays Symmetries
emma83
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am reading Weinberg's book and in the part on symmetries he speaks about rays, and says basically that 2 vectors U,V which are on the same ray can only differ by a phase factor \phi, so that U=e^{i\phi}V.

Is "ray" meaning "direction" here ? Can I rephrase it and say that 2 colinear vectors can only differ by a phase factor ?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
emma83 said:
Is "ray" meaning "direction" here ? Can I rephrase it and say that 2 colinear vectors can only differ by a phase factor ?

Hi emma! :smile:

From pp. 49-50:
A ray is a set of normalised vectors with Ψ and Ψ' belonging to the same ray if Ψ' = ξΨ, where ξ is an arbitrary complex number with |ξ| = 1

So a ray is an equivalence class of normalised vectors in Hilbert space …

two normalised vectors "are" the same ray if they only differ by a phase factor. :smile:

(but i don't think thinking in terms of "directions" is helpful, when these things are more like functions :wink:)
 
Thank your very much!

Ok, now I think I also understand why he infers e^{i\phi} as proportional factor (and not just e.g. a k \in \mathbb{C}) between the 2 vectors: because it is the most general complex proportional factor which is normalized to 1...
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top