Underwater projectile affected by Coriolis Effect

AI Thread Summary
The Coriolis Effect does influence underwater projectiles like torpedoes, but its impact is negligible compared to other factors such as water currents and waves. Since World War I, torpedoes have been equipped with gyroscopic stabilization and guidance systems to counteract trajectory disturbances. For simulations, if only the intercept course is plotted without considering underwater disturbances, the model may be unrealistic. Torpedoes built in the 1970s were indeed stabilized and guided, utilizing technologies developed earlier in the 20th century. Overall, while the Coriolis Effect exists, it is not a primary concern for torpedo targeting in practical applications.
minghia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If I am trying to fire a torpedo at another vehicle underwater do I need to worry about the Coriolis Effect? The speeds that torpedoes travel at are approximately 20 m/s and have a maximum range of around 10km.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Coriolis effect is even stronger for underwater object than for the one moving in vacuum. But it still is negligible when compared to other forces disturbing the torpedo trajectory (water currents, waves, imperfect geometry, etc.) so since WWI (when torpedos reached range bigger than 1000 meters) all torpedoes are equipped with gyroscopic stabilisation of their course and/or some kind of guidance.
 
I am trying to simulate a firing system for torpedoes and the only positional information I get about the launch vehicle is its latitude. I am curious as to why this is the case. I guessed the targetting solution may be affected by the Coriolis effect. If I wasn't modelling currents or any other underwater disturbance would I need to worry about it?

So if I only plot an intercept course for the target that should be sufficient?

Also is what you are saying about stabilsation true for a torpedo built in the 1970s?
 
xts said:
Coriolis effect is even stronger for underwater object than for the one moving in vacuum.
Why?
 
@A.T.
torpedo itself is affected by Coriolis force in the same manner as a projectile moving in vacuum. Let's say (we are on Northern hemisphere) to the right. But the water surrounding it flows around in opposite direction. The water is affected by Coriolis force to its right, which causes hydrostatic pressure gradient, giving higher pressure on the left side of torpedo, giving thus additional force pushing it to the right. Actually - I am not able to calculate it precisely nor even to estimate the magnitude of this additional force, but sureley it adds up additional force in the same direction as Coriolis force.

@Minghia: "If I wasn't modelling currents or any other underwater disturbance would I need to worry about it?"
Of course, not. But that means your model is unrealistic.

"Also is what you are saying about stabilsation true for a torpedo built in the 1970s?"
All torpedoes built in 1970' were not only stabilized, but also guided by some system, like sonar, passive sonar, or remote guidance. Guided torpedoes were introduced during WW-II, while gyroscopic stabilisation was added to torpedoe mechanisms as early as at beginning of WW-I.
See wiki: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torpedoe
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top