Uniform Beam Reactions | Coplanar Forces Problem Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter jernobyl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
A uniform beam of 6m length and 11 N weight is supported at two points, with additional weights of 6 N and 7 N hung from its ends. The discussion focuses on calculating the reactions at the supports and determining the extra force needed at point B to lift the beam off support C. The user initially struggles with understanding why gravity isn't explicitly factored into their calculations, despite arriving at the correct answers for the reactions. It is clarified that the forces are already expressed in Newtons, which accounts for gravity. The user expresses gratitude for the explanation and seeks further assistance with another related problem.
jernobyl
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform beam AB of length 6m and weight 11 N rests horizontally on two supports C and D, where AC = 1m and DB = 2m. Weights of 6 N and 7 N are hung from points A and B respectively. Calculate the reactions at each support. What extra force must be applied at B in order to cause the beam to just lift off the support at C?

Homework Equations



Moments...

The Attempt at a Solution



I figure this diagram is accurate:

force.jpg


My problem is that I get the right answer, but I can't understand why gravity isn't factored into the answer. Let me explain.

First of all I've taken moments about A, equating the clockwise and anticlockwise:

P + 4Q = 33g + 42g
P + 4Q = 75g equation 1

And about B:

5P + 2Q = 33g + 36g
5P + 2Q = 69g equation 2

Obviously now I have two simultaneous equations, so I solve them by multiplying equation 2 by 2, then subtracting equation 1.

10P + 4Q = 138g
-(P + 4Q = 75g)

9P = 63g
P = 7g = 68.6 N

Then substituting this in equation 1:

7g + 4Q = 75g
4Q = 68g
Q = 17g = 166.6 N

HOWEVER...the answers I have are 7 N for P, and 17 N for Q. Why has gravity not been factored into these answers? I don't understand! :S

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It already has been factored in, since the loads and beam weight are given in force units of Newtons. If the beam's mass was given instead, say in kilograms, only then would you have had to multiply the mass by g to get the proper force unit of Newtons.
 
Oh! Oh, I see. Okay, thanks! Um...I couldn't trouble you to look at my other coplanar force, could I? ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top