Uniform Continuity proof, does it look reasonable?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x) = x/(x+1) is proven to be uniformly continuous on the interval [0, infinity) using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. The proof demonstrates that for every epsilon (e) greater than 0, a corresponding delta (d) can be chosen such that the condition |f(x) - f(a)| < e holds whenever |x - a| < d. Specifically, by setting d = e, the proof confirms the uniform continuity of the function. Minor adjustments in notation and justification are suggested for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of continuity
  • Understanding of uniform continuity
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of functions
  • Knowledge of limits and continuity in real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of uniform continuity in detail
  • Explore examples of uniformly continuous functions beyond f(x) = x/(x+1)
  • Learn about the implications of uniform continuity on integrals and derivatives
  • Investigate the differences between uniform continuity and pointwise continuity
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of continuous functions in mathematical analysis.

spenghali
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Note: I will use 'e' to denote epsilon and 'd' to denote delta.

Using only the e-d definition of continuity, prove that the function f(x) = x/(x+1) is uniformly continuous on [0, infinity).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Proof:

Must show that for each e>0 there is d>0 s.t.

|x/(x+1) - a/(a+1)| < e whenever x,a are elements of [0, infinity) |x-a| < d.

|x/(x+1) - a/(a+1)| = |(-x+a)/[(x+1)(a+1)]| \leq |-x+a| = |x-a|.

Thus, given e>0, if we choose d=e then,

|x/(x+1) - a/(a+1)| < e whenever |x-a| < d.

This implies that f(x) = x/(x+1) is uniformly continuous on [0,infinity). QED
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure. That works. You could clean up few details, like x/(x+1) - a/(a+1)=(x-a)/((x+1)(a+1)), not (-a+x)/((x+1)(a+1)) and you could also explicitly justify why |(x-a)/((x+1)(a+1))|<=|x-a| but the proof works fine.
 
Cool, thanks for the input.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K