Uniform continuity proof on bounded sets

lionel_hutz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that if f is uniformly continuous on a bounded set S, then f is a bounded function on S.

Homework Equations


Uniform continuity: For all e>0, there exist d>0 s.t for all x,y in S |x-y| implies |f(x)-f(y)|

The Attempt at a Solution



Every time my book has covered a similar topic, it uses subsequences, which I'm a bit uncomfortable with. Is this following proof valid?

Let f be uniformly continuous on a bounded set, S (1), Then:

For all e>0, there exist d>0 s.t for all x,y in S |x-y| implies |f(x)-f(y)| (2)

so (3) |f(x)|<|f(y)| + e, for all x in S

Therefore, it's bounded on S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lionel_hutz said:

Homework Statement


Prove that if f is uniformly continuous on a bounded set S, then f is a bounded function on S.


Homework Equations


Uniform continuity: For all e>0, there exist d>0 s.t for all x,y in S |x-y| implies |f(x)-f(y)|

The Attempt at a Solution



Every time my book has covered a similar topic, it uses subsequences, which I'm a bit uncomfortable with. Is this following proof valid?

Let f be uniformly continuous on a bounded set, S (1), Then:

For all e>0, there exist d>0 s.t for all x,y in S |x-y| implies |f(x)-f(y)| (2)

so (3) |f(x)|<|f(y)| + e, for all x in S

Therefore, it's bounded on S
How did you get (3)? You don't know that ##|x-y| < d## for all ##x,y \in S##.

This same question was just asked yesterday. Perhaps the hints given in that thread will help:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=678514
 
lionel_hutz said:
Uniform continuity: For all e>0, there exist d>0 s.t for all x,y in S |x-y| implies |f(x)-f(y)|
I thought that was just a typo until..

The Attempt at a Solution




Let f be uniformly continuous on a bounded set, S (1), Then:

For all e>0, there exist d>0 s.t for all x,y in S |x-y| implies |f(x)-f(y)| (2)
S

Until I saw you "use" it. It isn't even a sentence. I think you need to work on understanding the definition of uniform continuity.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top