Uniform convergence of function series

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the uniform and local uniform convergence of the series of functions \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos kx}{k}\). The Weierstrass criterion is referenced, indicating that the series diverges for \(x = 2n\pi\) due to the divergence of \(\sum S_k\). Participants suggest exploring Fourier series and Dirichlet's criterion to establish convergence for values of \(x\) not equal to \(2n\pi\). The conversation also touches on the relationship between Abel's and Dirichlet's criteria, with suggestions to examine boundedness of the partial sums of \(\sum_{k=0}^{N} \cos(kx)\). The thread concludes with a recommendation to utilize complex analysis techniques for proving convergence.
twoflower
Messages
363
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've little probles with this one:

Analyse uniform and local uniform convergence of this series of functions:

<br /> \sum_{k = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos kx}{k}<br />

I'm trying to solve it using Weierstrass' criterion, ie.

<br /> \mbox{Let } f_n \mbox{ are defined on } 0 \neq M \subset \mathbb{R}\mbox{, let }<br /> S_n := \sup_{x \in M} \left| f_{n}(x)\right|, n \in \mathbb{N}. \mbox{ If } <br /> \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} S_n &lt; \infty\mbox{, then } \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_{n}(x) \rightrightarrows \mbox{ on } M.<br />

I can see from this it won't converge for x = 2n\pi, because then

<br /> \sup_{x \in \mathbb{R}} \left|\frac{\cos kx}{k}\right| = \frac{1}{k} =: S_{k} \mbox{ and thus } \ \sum S_k \ \mbox{diverges} \Rightarrow \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_{n} \mbox{ diverges}<br />

So it could converge on x \in [2n\pi + \epsilon, 2(n+1)\pi - \epsilon], \mbox{where } \epsilon \in (0, \pi) but I can't see how could I prove it, at least using this theorem. I also took a look at Abel's criterion, Dirichlet's criterion and theorems about change of sum and derivation\integral, but I didn't see the way to prove that.

Could you help me please?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a_k = \frac{1}{k} = \frac{1}{L} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x)cos(\frac{n \pi x}{L})dx

so obviously L = \pi & f is some even function. maybe Fourier series could help? i have no idea but when i saw that function i thought Fourier series. there's a theorem that says if f is 2-pi-periodic, continuous & piecewise-smooth then the Fourier series converges absolutely & uniformly. for that to work though you got to figure out what f is. i don't know if that makes it any easier or what.
 
Last edited:
fourier jr said:
a_k = \frac{1}{k} = \frac{1}{L} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x)cos(\frac{n \pi x}{L})dx

so obviously L = \pi & f is some even function. maybe Fourier series could help? i have no idea but when i saw that function i thought Fourier series. there's a theorem that says if f is 2-pi-periodic, continuous & piecewise-smooth then the Fourier series converges absolutely & uniformly. for that to work though you got to figure out what f is. i don't know if that makes it any easier or what.

Thank you for the suggestion, Fourier jr, we've just learning Fourier series, anyway I assume the problem I posted should be able to be solved just using knowledge of uniform convergence of sequences/series of functions. I'm not still much familiar with Fourier series to try it this way.
 
Dirichlet's criterium will work fine:

If \{a_n\}_{n=0}^\infty is a sequence of (complex) numbers whose sequence of partial sums are bounded:
\left|\sum_{n=0}^N a_n \right| &lt;M
for some M \in \mathbb{R}.
And if \{b_n\}_{n=0}^\infty is a sequence of real numbers with b_0 \geq b_1 \geq b_2 \geq ... which tend to zero (\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n =0) then the series:

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_nb_n converges.


So you have to show if \sum_{k=0}^N \cos (kx) is bounded when x is not a multiple of 2\pi.

Check the following series:
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} z^n
for z\in \mathbb{C}, |z|=1, z\not=1. Show that the partial sums are bounded and note that \cos kx = \Re e^{ikx}.
 
Last edited:
Nice problem. I found the thread "testing convergence of a series" in the general math forum and the link to Abel's test there helpful towards understanding it. Thanks guys.
 
If Abel's criterion on that page (and prolly according to other people as well) is what I refer to as Dirichlet's criterion, then what is Dirichlet's criterion referring to?
 
Galileo said:
If Abel's criterion on that page (and prolly according to other people as well) is what I refer to as Dirichlet's criterion, then what is Dirichlet's criterion referring to?

Well, I mean I found your analysis helpful too Galileo and is in fact what led me to connect the two. :smile:
 
Galileo said:
If Abel's criterion on that page (and prolly according to other people as well) is what I refer to as Dirichlet's criterion, then what is Dirichlet's criterion referring to?

Our professor told us the Abel's test from the link as Abel's-Dirichlet's criterion, but it was bit more complex.

Now I'm looking at PDF of lecture of another professor and he titled the exactly same test as the one from the link as Dirichlet's criterion (he also has Abel's test there, it's something slightly different).
 
Last edited:
Two flower, if I may make a suggestion as I'm learning this too, try going into the Abel's link over there and check out the example for:

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{Cos(n)}{n}

They use some complex analysis to prove convergence. The technique they used can be applied to your problem. For example, I found it interesting that going through the proof for your question involved considering the quotient:

\frac{2}{|1-e^{ix}|}

Now, for what values of x does this quotient not exist?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top