Uniform Convergence Proof (new question)

JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Prove that the sequence f_n(x) = x^{\frac{2^n-1}{2^n}} converges uniformly in the interval [0,1].


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First notice that the f_n do converge to f(x) = x for all x in [0,1]. By definition, if for every positive epsilon the difference x^{\frac{2^n - 1}{2^n}} - x (this difference is positive so I omitted the absolute value signs) can be made smaller than epsilon for ALL x in the interval at the same time, provided n is sufficiently large, then we say the f_n converge uniformly to f.


The maximum value for the function g(x) = x^{\frac{2^n - 1}{2^n}} - x in the interval [0,1] occurs when x = (1 - \frac{1}{2^n})^{2^n}.

Let M denote the x value at which g attains its maximum in [0,1]. Then after some algebraic manipulation (it's going to be very messy to show, please assume the algebra is right for this step) we can write
g(M) = (1 - \frac{1}{2^n}})^{2^n - 1}(\frac{1}{2^n}) < \frac{1}{2^n}.

Now, since g(M) is the maximum of g, we can write x^{\frac{2^n - 1}{2^n}} - x < g(M) < \frac{1}{2^n} where the inequality holds for all x in [0,1]. Since the right hand side goes to 0 for increasing n, and is greater than f_n(x) - f(x) for all x in [0,1] at the same time, it follows the sequence converges uniformly.

This is the first time I have proved anything about uniform continuity, so I am not sure if my method was correct. It may be overcomplicated, but does the proof hold?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just checked your algebra for you, and it's all good. Nice work! By the way, once you show that |g(M)| < 1/(2^n), and that 1/(2^n) -> 0 as n -> 0, you're basically done. Also, finding the maximum of |f_n(x) - f(x)| is a good way of verifying uniform convergence.
 
Thanks for checking it! :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top