Uniform Pully with a single block, do not understand where mass relates?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between the mass of a block and the equations governing uniform cylindrical pulleys with a single block. The user is struggling to incorporate the mass of the block into their calculations, particularly when attempting to find acceleration and tension. It is noted that two unknowns—tension and acceleration—require two equations for a solution, and the rotational equivalent of Newton's second law (Net Torque = Iα) is recommended as a necessary equation for the cylinder. The user seeks clarity on how to effectively apply these principles to solve their problem. Understanding the interplay between linear and rotational dynamics is essential for accurately solving pulley-related physics problems.
StingerManB
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
OK, my largest issue with dealing with uniform cylindrical pulleys and a single block (object) is understanding where mass of the block relates in any of the equations.

Specifically, I was doing some problems earlier with no issues at all. Then I came across one asking about the mass of the block hanging from the pulley. The book and my notes do not speak of this.
Known:
mass of the pulley
radius,
Tension,

This seems like a pretty straight-forward topic, yet I cannot seem to locate much on it.
Can anyone please explain the topic?
Thank you in advance, I have already found much help from these forums, and without them would probably not pass calculus based physics!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried solving for acceleration then using:

ma = mg - T, rearranged as T = m(g-a) but this did not give me a correct solution either. hmmmmm.
 
StingerManB said:
OK, my largest issue with dealing with uniform cylindrical pulleys and a single block (object) is understanding where mass of the block relates in any of the equations.

Specifically, I was doing some problems earlier with no issues at all. Then I came across one asking about the mass of the block hanging from the pulley. The book and my notes do not speak of this.
Are you talking about a cylinder that has a massless rope wrapped around it from which a block is hanging? And you're supposed to find the acceleration of the block?
Known:
mass of the pulley
radius,
Tension,
Generally the tension is not known, but you can figure it out.

StingerManB said:
I tried solving for acceleration then using:

ma = mg - T, rearranged as T = m(g-a) but this did not give me a correct solution either.
That looks like a reasonable equation for the block. Note that you have two unknowns, tension and acceleration. You need a second equation--one for the cylinder--to solve for the acceleration.
 
Ok, thank you. I will look for some info on this. I am not too familiar with the equations of a pulley.
To clarify the problem, I am looking for the mass of a block hanging from a single pulley.
From the problem I am given the mass of the pulley, the radius of the pulley, and the tension in the cable.
Do you know, specifically, which equation I am missing for the cylinder?
Thank you again for the help. I need to know this subject in and out...
 
StingerManB said:
To clarify the problem, I am looking for the mass of a block hanging from a single pulley.
From the problem I am given the mass of the pulley, the radius of the pulley, and the tension in the cable.
OK. Instead of the tension being unknown, the mass is unknown. You still have two unknowns and need two equations.
Do you know, specifically, which equation I am missing for the cylinder?
Yes, the rotational equivalent of Newton's 2nd law: Net Torque = Iα
 
you have PM.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
848
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
13K
Back
Top