Uniform Rod Attached To Spring Motion Equation Problem

TheDoctor078
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



'Figure 2 shows a uniform rod of length L= 0.2m and mass m=0.2kg pivoted at one end. The other end is attached to a horizontal spring with spring constant k =3.0 N/m. The spring is neither stretched nor compressed when the rod is perfectly vertical. You can also assume that the force due to the spring is always horizontal.

a) Show that the equation of motion for the rod is:

\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}= \frac{3k}{m}\sin\theta\cos\theta - \frac{3g}{2L}\sin\theta

Homework Equations



F=-kx, <br /> F=ma, <br /> F=-mg\sin\theta<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no real idea of how to tackle this problem, I presume we need to resolve the system horizontally in terms of the restoring forces needed by both parts, which in this case would be:

F=-kx-mg\sin\theta

After that, I have no idea how to tackle the problem, if someone could help point me in the right direction, it would be much appreciated as I'm getting a little bit stressed out at not being able to get the grips with this question...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For linear motion we use F = ma.

Similarly for angular motion we use

T = I\alpha

where T = torque, I = moment of inertia and \alpha is the angular acceleration.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top