Uniformly charged disk and the E field some distance Z from the center

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E) from a uniformly charged disk at a distance z from its center. The equation for the electric field is given as E = 2πkσz(1 - z/√(z² + R²)), where R is the disk's radius. The participant is attempting to understand how the electric field decreases with increasing z, initially assuming a 1/r² relationship. After some mathematical manipulation, including a binomial expansion, it is suggested that the electric field decreases as 1/z, but this is challenged by others who emphasize that the disk should behave like a point charge at large distances. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying mathematical techniques to derive accurate physical interpretations.
anban
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi,

I have a problem that describes a uniformly charged disk and the electric field a distance z from the center.

I have found an equation that describes the E field at any point z already. Now I have to find out how the E field decreases as z increases-- as 1/r^2, I assume, but I am not sure.

Homework Equations



E = 2\pikσz(1-\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^{2}+R^{2}}}) where R is the radius of the disk and z is the distance away from the disk.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know I have to do a binomial expansion of (R/z). I think I am having mathematical issues rather than physical issues.

Before the expansion, I need to get some term (R/z). Does taking out a z^{2) from the denominator leave a z^{4} out front? Or a z^{3} out front? If I can figure this out then I know the rest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\sqrt{z^2+R^2} = \sqrt{z^2(1+(R/z)^2)}## and ##\sqrt{(a b)} = \sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}##
 
anban said:
E = 2\pikσz(1-\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^{2}+R^{2}}})

I believe you must have a typo in this expression. The dimensions on the right do not match the dimensions of electric field.
 
Good catch: The expression should be E = 2\pikσ(1-\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^{2}+R^{2}}}).

So, the denominator of the last term can be rewritten as z\sqrt{1-(R^{2}/z^{2})}. After a binomial expansion, I got that the E field decreases as 1/z.
 
anban said:
I got that the E field decreases as 1/z.

I don't think that's correct. Check your binomial expansion simplification. Your original idea that the disk should behave as a point charge for large distances is right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top