Unit calculations - DWI MRI (Stejskal-Tanner)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the apparent diffusion coefficient (D) using experimental data, specifically addressing the unit of b in the context of DWI MRI. The participants clarify the necessary conversions for the gyromagnetic ratio (gamma), pulse length (delta), magnetic field gradient (G), and repetition time (tau) to derive the correct units for b. They explore how to convert MHz/T to s/T and Gs/cm to T/m, ultimately leading to the conclusion that b should equal 10^4 s/cm^2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of unit conversions to achieve the desired measurement. Understanding these conversions is crucial for accurate calculations in MRI diffusion studies.
Eowyn
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Calculate the apparent diffusion based on experimental data.
Relevant Equations
I = e^bD
b = gamma^2 * delta^2 * G^2 *(tau - delta/3)
Ok, so basically my task is to calculate the apparent diffusion D based on experimental data, which is kind of easy, BUT the problem is with unit of b...
Gamma is gyromagnetic ratio and can be expressed as: (s*T)-1 or MHz/T --> but I am not so sure, teacher did not specify
Delta is the pulse length: ms
G is the gradient of magnetic field: Gs/cm
tau - repetition time: ms

So I tried...
b = [(MHz/T)2*(ms)2*(Gs/cm)*ms] = [s/cm2 * 10-5]

How am I supposed to get b in s/cm2 from those units? How to let go that 10^-5? Or maybe it's ok, but I'm missing something when it comes to understanding.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The unit for b should be s/cm2, so you need to do some unit conversions to get to that. To convert MHz/T to s/T, you can use the fact that 1 MHz = 10^6 Hz, and 1 Hz = 1 s^(-1). So, 1 MHz/T = 10^6 s^(-1)/T. Similarly, you can convert Gs/cm to T/m by using the fact that 1 Gs = 10^4 A/m, and 1 A/m = 1 T/m. After converting the units, you should have: b = (10^6 s^(-1)/T)^2 * (ms)^2 * (10^4 T/m) * (ms) = 10^4 s/cm^2
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top