Unit cell conversion and shape of fuel pellet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conversion of square unit cells to circular shapes for calculating the thermal utilization factor in fuel pellets. It highlights the challenges of simulating circular fuel with square moderators and questions the practicality of manufacturing rectangular prism-shaped fuel pellets. The cylindrical shape of fuel pellets is noted to have a larger surface area, which may enhance neutron interaction and reaction rates. Concerns are raised about the mechanical disadvantages and stress concentrations associated with square pellets. The conversation also touches on various reactor designs and their fuel arrangements, emphasizing the complexity of fuel geometry in nuclear applications.
oksuz_
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
As you may know, below is the conversion process of square unit cell into circular shape in order to calculate the thermal utilization factor (f) for a lattice.

unit cell.png


As far as I know, it is really difficult to make a simulation for which a lattice is constructed as a circular fuel and square moderator in shape or the other way around.

My question is why fuel pellets are not manufactured as rectangular prism. Is there some kind of drawback?

Thank you in advance.
 

Attachments

  • unit cell.png
    unit cell.png
    12.5 KB · Views: 891
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello,

In my opinion, the shape of fuel pellets has to do mainly with the combustion process.

What do you think?
 
For the same volume of cylindrical and cubic pellets, the surface area is bigger for cylindrical shape. So, neutrons see more fuel in that design but I am not sure tough.
 
  • Like
Likes DoItForYourself
I agree, the surface area is bigger in the case of cylindrical pellets. The surface area of the solid plays an important role in reaction's rate.

However, I do not know whether the manufacturing of cubic pellets is more difficult than the manufacturing of cylindrical ones.
 
DoItForYourself said:
However, I do not know whether the manufacturing of cubic pellets is more difficult than the manufacturing of cylindrical ones.
Mechanically, it would be a disadvantage to manufacture square pellets, and similarly, square tubes would produce high stresses in the corners. The fuel rods of LWR fuel can develop relatively high internal gas pressure.
oksuz_ said:
As far as I know, it is really difficult to make a simulation for which a lattice is constructed as a circular fuel and square moderator in shape or the other way around.
The square moderator simply reflects the square or rectilinear array in which cylindrical fuel rods are arranged. VVER fuel and Fast Reactor fuel are arranged in hexagonal arrays, or triangular lattices.

Some gas-cooled graphite moderated reactors used fuel dispersed in hexagonal fuel blocks with cylindrical cooling channels, while pebble bed reactors use spherical fuel elements that do not necessarily have a regular array.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top