Unit Vector to Verbal Representation

AI Thread Summary
Unit vectors, represented as i along the x-axis and j along the y-axis, provide the directional components of a vector in physics. To convert unit vectors to verbal representation, one must determine the vector's x and y components and express them in terms of magnitude and direction, such as {24 [m] at 65 (degrees) along +x}. Unit vectors have a length of 1 and indicate direction, while their linear combinations can define displacements from an origin. Understanding the Cartesian coordinate system is essential, as it utilizes mutually orthogonal unit vectors to describe positions in 2D or 3D space. Mastering this concept is crucial for grasping more complex vector operations in physics.
eggsandbakey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm currently taking my first physics class, and on the very first day, my teacher began discussing vectors as if everyone knew what Unit Vectors were.


I've managed to understand most of his lecture thus far, but I still don't understand- How do you convert from Unit vectors (denoted by i along the x axis, and j along the y axis) to Verbal representation? (My teacher commonly writes things in verbal representation like this: {24 [m] at 65 (degrees) along +x}.


Could anyone help me?


- eggsandbakey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've never heard that referred to as the "verbal representation", but that's as good a name as any.

Unit vectors essentially give you the components of a vector along the axes. Can you take that example you gave and find its x and y components?
 
Unit vectors always have length 1 and these vectors always point in the direction of the axes. What angle do they make with the x-axis?
 
The vector provides a 'direction', and the unit (or unity) simply implies that it has magnitude 1, which is analogous to 1 being the basic unit of counting or whole numbers.

In the Cartesian coordinate system (x, y, z in 3D, or just x, y in 2D) the i,j,k or \hat{x},\hat{y},\hat{z}, represent mutually orthogonal (perpendicular) orientations or directions. Each is independent of the other.

By linear combinations of the unit vectors, one can define a displacement from some origin.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top