Unit Vector z in Spherical Terms: (1, 0, 0)

  • Thread starter Thread starter formulajoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate
AI Thread Summary
To express the unit vector z at the point (2,3,-4) in spherical terms, it is clarified that the unit vector should reflect the direction of the position vector while maintaining a magnitude of 1. The unit vector r, pointing away from the origin, should be derived from the position vector (2,3,-4) but normalized to have a magnitude of 1. There is confusion regarding the interpretation of the question, as it seems to ask for a representation of the z unit vector in spherical coordinates, which may not be meaningful given the non-zero x and y components of the position vector. Ultimately, the focus should be on converting the direction of the position vector into spherical coordinates while ensuring the unit vector maintains a magnitude of 1. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in interpreting the requirements of the problem.
formulajoe
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
at (2,3,-4) express the unit vector z in spherical terms.
express the unit vector r in rectangular terms.

for the first part, would it just be (1,X,0)
fi should be zero because that's the angle the line makes with the z axis, and since this is going to be parallel to the z-axis this should be zero and theta shouldn't matter. and the unit vector r should just be the point made into a vector right? since the unit vector r is pointing away from the origin. so at (2,3,-4) its going to be in the direction of (2,3,-4).
should it have a different magnitude?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume (2,3,-4) describes a position vector

By definition a unit vector is a vector with a magnitude of 1.
so in the rectangular system, you result should be a vector with the same direction of (2,3,-4) but with a magnitude of 1.

for your answer in spherical coordinates it seems wrong, but maybe I am misunderstanding the question... It seems that you are asking to convert the position vector (2,3,-4) into a unit vector and give the answer in spherical coordinates. Is that right? if so then your answer is incorrect as it is not parallel to the z axis since it has both nonzero x and y components and thus would make an angle wrt both the z axis and the x axis.
 
(2,3,-4) is a point. it wants me to represent the z unit vector in the spherical system. basically i think it wants me to represent the z unit vector from that point using spherical coordinates.
 
I really doubt that is what they are asking you, because that is basically pointless, If it is, than I don't know what to tell you,,, I'm not saying its impossible, but I wouldn't know. It seems much more likely that they want you to describe the unit vector having the same direction as the position vector (2,3,-4) but in spherical coordinates.
 
heres exactly what it says
at point T(2,3,-4) express a sub z in the spherical system and a sub r in the rectangular system.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top