Units regarding a photoelectric question

AI Thread Summary
Electrons are ejected from a metal surface at speeds up to 4.71×10^5 m/s when exposed to light with a wavelength of 628 nm. The discussion revolves around calculating the work function using the formula Max Kinetic energy = hf - Eo, where Eo is the work function. Participants clarify the correct approach to calculating kinetic energy and converting it to electron volts, emphasizing the importance of using SI units. The relativistic formula is mentioned but deemed unnecessary due to the electron's speed being low relative to the speed of light. The conversation concludes with a consensus that Newtonian dynamics can be applied in this scenario.
bemigh
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Alright, let's be real here

Electrons are ejected from a metal surface with speeds ranging up to 4.71×105 m/s when light with a wavelength of lambda = 628 nm is used. What is the work function (in eV) of the surface?

Alright, money, using the formula: Max Kinetic energy = hf - Eo
where Eo is the work function. You have all the givens, the answer is supposed to be in eV. Now, I am not sure what's happening, but I am not geting the right answer. To see if I am doing something wrong, i got Kinetic energy=1.010485755x10^-19, and hf=-2.5999x10^-21
try it yourself, maybe I am screwing up the units
Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't know how you got your kinetic energy but use this formula

\Phi = \frac{1}{e} (\frac{hc}{\lambda} - m_{e} c^2 (\gamma - 1}}))

i turst you know what the formulas are about. The 1/e factor is to convert to electron volts.
 
units

Hey brah, that's cool, I am also from Toronto, well, I am in Hamilton right now..
Anyways, I am not famaliar with the formula, what am i solving for, the work function? and what is the greek symbol in the brackets at the the end?
Cheers
 
yes i simply used a different symbol for work function

the Phi in the beginning represents the work function and
\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

Max kinetic energy = hc/lambda - Eo that's right and Eo represents the work function

the kinetic energy of the electron is going to be so great (maybe) that you'll have to use the relativistic formula, else you can use the 1/2 mv^2 ither way you get the same answer. mc^2(gamma -1) is equivalent (for low speeds v<<c) to 1/2 mv^2.

But I am babbling, if you want to convert to electron volts just do this, solve it like you normally would, keep all units in metric SI units and only after you're done then divide by the elctron change of 1.6 x 10^-19 C
 
nevermind, got it chief, thanks
 
There's no need for the relativistic formula,simply because the electron's speed is roughly 1.5 \cdot 10^{-3}c,so you can use the Newtonian dynamics without any problem...

Daniel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top