Unpacking Nuclear Fission: Understanding Binding Energy

Kaushik96
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
During nuclear fission a heavy nucleus of low binding energy splits into two middle mass nuclei with high binding energy ! From where does this energy suddenly come from ??

And why is the binding energy of heavy nuclei lesser than that of middle mass nuclei ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Kaushik96 said:
During nuclear fission a heavy nucleus of low binding energy splits into two middle mass nuclei with high binding energy ! From where does this energy suddenly come from ??
Binding energy in nuclei is always negative. A high binding energy corresponds to a low-energy state.

And why is the binding energy of heavy nuclei lesser than that of middle mass nuclei ??
Electromagnetic repulsion of the protons (positive contribution to binding energy) grows quicker than the negative contribution from the strong interaction.
 


mfb said:
Binding energy in nuclei is always negative.

No, the potential energy in nuclei, with the zero defined at infinite nucleon separation, is always negative. Being defined as the energy you have to supply to break up an atom, binding energy in nuclei is always positive.
 


Ok, you are right, I used the wrong word.
 


mfb said:
Binding energy in nuclei is always negative. A high binding energy corresponds to a low-energy state.

I was not able to understand the first part ! Could you explain in detail ??
 


Binding energy in nuclei is always positive = potential energy of a nucleus is always negative.
If you combine x protons and y neutrons to a (possible) nucleus, energy is released - otherwise, the nucleus would not be a bound state at all.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top