Unplug or not unplug, that is the question. (Coma)

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ethical and medical implications of unplugging life support for patients in a coma, particularly when the likelihood of recovery is minimal. There is a debate about whether doctors have the authority to make such decisions, with some arguing that it should be left to the patient's family. The consensus is that once brain death is diagnosed, recovery is highly unlikely, and cases of apparent recovery are often attributed to misdiagnosis. The importance of living wills is highlighted, as they provide guidance for families regarding end-of-life decisions. Overall, the conversation reflects deep concerns about the complexities of medical ethics and family dynamics in critical care situations.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
There is a hypothetical case of a coma.
I want to know if doctors have the right to unplug the person.
What happens when the chances of waking up are very nil?
What happens when the chances of waking up are low and it can take several years for the person to wake up?
I read this article which says medically futile life sustaining treatments are left to the doctor's choice. http://www.fammed.ouhsc.edu/Palliative-Care/documents/Medically Futile Care.ppt

But, I heard doctors cannot unplug people like that. What's the deal?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Once all that remains is the hindbrain, then it's just autonomous functions (heart/lungs). The person is essentially lost. I have heard stories of people "coming back" from brain death (such as Suzanne Chin) but they are very rare and are most likely cases of misdiagnosis rather than genuine recovery.

While Dr Kwek said he could not comment as he did not know the full details of Ms Chin's case, he reiterated that it is not possible to recover and regain consciousness after brain death has occurred.
He added that no such case has ever been reported in medical journals.
"So if anyone were to claim so, it would only be logical to presume that either the diagnosis of brain death had been made in error, or that the patient's family had misunderstood what had been told to them by the doctors," he said.

http://yourhealth.asiaone.com/content/meet-brain-death-expert#sthash.KuKl0Jw7.dpuf
 
I say one should leave the choice to immediate relatives. Personally, I would not take a relative off of life-support. Arguments that keeping 'brain dead' people alive are straining the system are fundamentally wrong because tax-funded medicine should not have taken up that responsibility (if they would later claim that the comatose are straining the budget.)
 
Pythagorean said:
... most likely cases of misdiagnosis rather than genuine recovery.
[/url]

do you know if a biopsy is performed during diagnosis?
 
This would be a great time to explore the value of a living will. Would you want extreme efforts made to prolong your life, and under what circumstances? My mother was vegetative (at best) for a week before our family could come to grips with the situation. Not good. Internal strife in the family was horrible, at best.

My wife and I have living wills drawn up by a lawyer friend of ours, and at least they give some guidance to family as to our wishes should really bad stuff come down.

Good luck.
 
I need to get another living will done and hide it from Evo Child, she destroyed the last DNR I had drawn up. She says she will not let then pull the plug on me. :( I want no extraordinary measures taken to try to resuscitate me. I don't want my family paying to keep me on life support.
 
alingy1 said:
I read this article which says medically futile life sustaining treatments are left to the doctor's choice. http://www.fammed.ouhsc.edu/Palliative-Care/documents/Medically Futile Care.ppt
That's not really what it says. It says that futile treatments can be refused, but only in two states and only after attempting to transfer the patient to another facility willing to comply with the patient's/power of attorney holder's wishes.
 
'roidbreaker said:
do you know if a biopsy is performed during diagnosis?

Not that I'm aware of:

In 1968, an ad hoc committee at Harvard Medical School reexamined the definition of brain death and defined irreversible coma, or brain death, as unresponsiveness and lack of receptivity, the absence of movement and breathing, the absence of brain-stem reflexes, and coma whose cause has been identified.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772257/

The above review also includes a lengthy description of the determination process; I haven't read it word-for-word, but it looks like it's mostly nonintrusive tests and a blood sample. Basically, a properly functioning brain should still reproduce standard reflexes that can be tested behaviorally.
 
  • #10

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
10K
Replies
287
Views
25K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
76K
Replies
7
Views
17K
Back
Top