Unraveling the Mystery of Dimensional Analysis

AI Thread Summary
Dimensional analysis simplifies physical quantities into their fundamental units, such as length (L), mass (M), and time (T). Each dimension can be expressed in terms of these basic units; for example, volume is represented as length cubed (L^3), and acceleration as length per time squared (L/T^2). The confusion arises from understanding how these dimensions are derived, particularly in equations like force (F=ma), where substituting acceleration reveals the dimensions of force as mass times length over time squared (M·L/T^2). By breaking down each quantity into its basic units, the relationships become clearer. Overall, mastering dimensional analysis is essential for understanding physics concepts accurately.
Beholder
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello I've been learning the basics of physics over the past few weeks and thought I knew what they meant when they would refer to the dimensions of something for instance if you asked me what are the dimensions of acceleration I'd say 'change in velocity/time'' or 'v2-v1/T' but I came across a page on a topic I'm not familar with 'Dimensional analysis' and they had a little quiz and said the following

1. volume = Length cubed
2. acceleration (velocity/time) = Length/Time squared
3. density (mass/volume) = Mass / Length cubed
4. force (mass × acceleration) = Mass x Length/Time squared
5. charge (current × tiime) = Current x Time

Where did they get these 'dimensions from'?

For the first one its only true for the volume of a perfect cube.

The second one it seems they are substituting length for velocity and I don't know where they got the squared from.

The third one again uses a perfect cube.

Number four I though would just be the well known F=MA I don't know where the length or T squared come in

and number five makes sense...

Can anyone clear this up, I'm baffled... thanks
BTW the link to the page I'm referring to is: http://www.physics.uoguelph.ca/tutorials/dimanaly/dimanaly_ans1a.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's see.

Dimensional analysis works by breaking down the units of whatever you're measuring into their simplest forms. When you do this, you find that all units are made up from just four basic units; these are length (L), mass (M), time (T) and force (F). (Temperature is a fifth, but you shouldn't be needing this for now).

When you're being asked for the dimension of something, you're really being asked for its units, in their most basic form.

So for (1), as you know, the units of volume are cubic metres; m^3. This one's simple, - the only units are those of length. Because it's volume, it's cubed.

I take it you're with me so far.

So, similarly, the units of 'acceleration' are m/s^2 (or "metres per second per second"). In dimensional terms, this breaks down to (L/T)/T, - units of length (metres), divided twice by units of time (seconds). The (L/T) part of this is in fact velocity, - it's a distance (or a length, L) divided by a time T. You know that acceleration is simply velocity/time. The squared comes from the fact that you've divided the length by time twice.

For (4), you're right that the force F comes from F=Ma. Substitute what you got for the dimensions of acceleration in (2) into this equation.


Sorry if I've fudged through this a bit, I didn't really understand it when I came across it first either.

I really must get round to learning Latex one day too...
 
Beholder said:
Hello I've been learning the basics of physics over the past few weeks and thought I knew what they meant when they would refer to the dimensions of something for instance if you asked me what are the dimensions of acceleration I'd say 'change in velocity/time'' or 'v2-v1/T' but I came across a page on a topic I'm not familar with 'Dimensional analysis' and they had a little quiz and said the following

1. volume = Length cubed
2. acceleration (velocity/time) = Length/Time squared
3. density (mass/volume) = Mass / Length cubed
4. force (mass × acceleration) = Mass x Length/Time squared
5. charge (current × tiime) = Current x Time

Where did they get these 'dimensions from'?

For the first one its only true for the volume of a perfect cube.
Let us say that T represents time and L length.
Any time you are dealing with a volume the units will be in terms of L3. For example the volume of a sphere is \frac 4 3 \pi r^3 note that the radius is cubed therefore if the radius is given in meters the volume will be in m3. Any volume will have dimensions of L3.

The second one it seems they are substituting length for velocity and I don't know where they got the squared from.
What are the dimensions of velocity? \fr ac L T so if you divide by time one more time you get for acceleration:
\frac V T = \frac {\frac L T} T = \frac L { T^2}
The third one again uses a perfect cube.
Read the the first one again.

Number four I though would just be the well known F=MA I don't know where the length or T squared come in
Read the acceleration explanation again.
and number five makes sense...

Can anyone clear this up, I'm baffled... thanks
BTW the link to the page I'm referring to is: http://www.physics.uoguelph.ca/tutorials/dimanaly/dimanaly_ans1a.html
 
Dimensions

Integral said:
Let us say that T represents time and L length.
Any time you are dealing with a volume the units will be in terms of L3. For example the volume of a sphere is \frac 4 3 \pi r^3 note that the radius is cubed therefore if the radius is given in meters the volume will be in m3. Any volume will have dimensions of L3.


What are the dimensions of velocity? \fr ac L T so if you divide by time one more time you get for acceleration:
\frac V T = \frac {\frac L T} T = \frac L { T^2}

Read the the first one again.


Read the acceleration explanation again.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah very clear, I understand now, just breaking them down. Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top