Unravelling Electric Flux: Area Vector and E-Field Vector

AI Thread Summary
Electric flux is calculated using the dot product of the area vector and the electric field vector, where the area vector is defined as perpendicular to the surface. This approach is necessary because flux measures the amount of a vector field passing through a surface, which depends on both the area and the angle of the surface relative to the field direction. Although area is a scalar quantity, treating it as a vector simplifies calculations and accurately accounts for the angle between the surface and the field. The flux remains consistent across surfaces cutting through the same "tube" of flux, but adjustments must be made for angled surfaces using the cosine of the angle. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems related to electric flux.
anonymousphys
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
1. When solving for electric flux, we dot product the area vector and the e-field vector. Why does area have a vector, and why is it perpendicular to the surface?

Homework Equations


phi=EA

The Attempt at a Solution


Isn't area scalar; Is it because we just want to simplify the calculations so we "imagine" it to be vector?

Thanks for any replies.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

anonymousphys said:
1. When solving for magnetic flux, we dot product the area vector and the e-field vector. Why does area have a vector, and why is it perpendicular to the surface?

Isn't area scalar; Is it because we just want to simplify the calculations so we "imagine" it to be vector?

Hi anonymousphys! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Basically for the same reason that to find the angle between two planes, we actually find the angle between their normals.

(Scalar) flux is the amount of a vector field going through a surface.

It's proportional to area, but it also depends on the angle the area presents to the field direction.

Imagine a "tube" of flux … the flux through any surface cutting that tube will be the same, but if the surface is angled, the surface area will be larger by an amount (in the limit) equal to 1/cosine of the angle, so we have to multiply the area by the cosine first to keep the result the same for all angles.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
972
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
705
Back
Top