Unravelling the Mystery of J & l Quantum Numbers

Ayame17
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Quantum Numbers

What is the difference between using J and l for quantum numbers? I have some lecture notes that aren't fully explained. It was talking about rotational transitions for diatomic molecules, and said the energy of a photon going from level J to level J-1 is \frac{Jh^2}{4\pi^2\mu(r^2)}. Now, I remember from my quantum module last year, that E_{rot}=\frac{L^2}{2I}=\frac{l(l+1)h^2}{8\pi^2\mu(r^2)}. I can see the resemblance between the two equations, but I just can't figure out the link between J and l!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"l" quantum is number is specifically used to describe angular momentum.

"j" can either describe angular momentum or spin.
 
Yes, I found those descriptions online, but it doesn't help me with the link between them - we were told that J was the rotational quantum number of the upper level. If these two equations ARE the same, that means that 2J=l(l+1) - is this true? And if so, what are the steps to prove it?
 
Many different notations and conventions are used. So you must look up the definition given in your difference.



But you have not been careful here, \frac{Jh^2}{4\pi^2\mu(r^2)} is the energy difference of states with QM# J and J-1, and the level energies are given according to: E_{rot}=\frac{{\vec{J}}^2}{2I}=\frac{J(J+1)h^2}{8\pi^2\mu( r^2)}


So you must evaluate E_J - E_{J-1}
 
Last edited:
I hadn't realized it, but it's so simple when you put it like that. Thanks, that's helped a lot!
 
Ayame17 said:
I hadn't realized it, but it's so simple when you put it like that. Thanks, that's helped a lot!


hehe :biggrin:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top