Unsure of how to approach this type of problem—Current densities in wires

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Blind Watchmaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach Type Wires
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding current densities in wires and the application of relevant equations such as J = nqvd and J = I/A. Participants express confusion about when to substitute variables like Q = It and seek clarity on the drift velocity formula, questioning if alternative forms exist. The relationship between wire resistance and factors like resistivity, length, and cross-sectional area is also explored. Additionally, there is a query about the consistency of drift velocity across different cables, leading to a mathematical comparison of their velocities. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in applying formulas and understanding the underlying principles of electrical current in wires.
The Blind Watchmaker
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Capture.PNG



1.PNG

Homework Equations


J = nqvd
J = I/A
Q = It

The Attempt at a Solution


Basically we check whether the variable that we are looking at is proportional or inversely proportional. However, at what part do we stop? Where is it okay to substitute say Q = It and where is it not? I am getting confused on this one.

Also, are there other forms of the velocity drift formula? Or is it strictly limited to vd = J/(nq) = I/(Anq) ? Thank you! :)
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    12.3 KB · Views: 816
  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    27.8 KB · Views: 794
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to calculate the resistance of a wire? If the same material, you can find the relative resistance, then use Ohm's Law to find relative currents.
 
For the first question, use this equation:
The Blind Watchmaker said:
Q = It
And for the 2nd question, how does the resistance of each wire depend on the resistivity ρ the length L and the cross-sectional area A?

EDIT -- Beat out by @scottdave Again! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
berkeman said:
For the first question, use this equation:

And for the 2nd question, how does the resistance of each wire depend on the resistivity ρ the length L and the cross-sectional area A?

EDIT -- Beat out by @scottdave Again! :smile:
My answer is only IV true, but in the answer key it is IV and V. How does the velocity drift stay the same in both cables?

vd1/vd2 = J1/nq1⋅ nq2/J2
vd1/vd2 = q2/q1
vd1/vd2 = 4q1/q1 (based on the relation that I1 = 1/4 I2)
vd1 = 4vd2

That is why I am asking whether other formula for velocity drift exists or not (excluding the fermi velocity which is irrelevant here). Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top