Unsure where g term comes from? in this equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter trojan15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Term
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a uniform rod pivoted at one end as it falls. The user initially attempts to derive the angular acceleration using torque and moment of inertia but becomes confused about the origin of the gravitational term 'g' in the final answer. Participants clarify that the torque is generated by the gravitational force acting on the rod, which is proportional to its mass and the acceleration due to gravity. The correct approach involves recognizing that gravity is the force causing the torque, leading to the inclusion of 'g' in the final equation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the forces at play in rotational dynamics.
trojan15
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a uniform rod of mass 12 kg and length 1.0 m. At its end the rod is attached to a fixed, friction-free pivot. Initially the rod is balanced vertically above the pivot and begins to fall from rest. Determine
a) the angular acceleration of the rod as it passes through the horizontal.

Homework Equations


I started with torque = Ia = ML/2I got my equation down to

a= ML / [2(1/3 M L ^2)]

The Attempt at a Solution


however I am unsure what to do after this step, the answer key has it further reduced to 3g/2L, but I am confused where the g comes from?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trojan15 said:

Homework Statement


Consider a uniform rod of mass 12 kg and length 1.0 m. At its end the rod is attached to a fixed, friction-free pivot. Initially the rod is balanced vertically above the pivot and begins to fall from rest. Determine
a) the angular acceleration of the rod as it passes through the horizontal.

Homework Equations


I started with torque = Ia = ML/2I got my equation down to

a= ML / [2(1/3 M L ^2)]

The Attempt at a Solution


however I am unsure what to do after this step, the answer key has it further reduced to 3g/2L, but I am confused where the g comes from?

Thanks
Hello trojan15. Welcome to PF !

In your equation, Iα = ML/2 , what does M represent?

How is it that the right hand side represents torque?
 
Hello trojan15, Welcome to Physics Forums.

trojan15 said:
I started with torque = Ia = ML/2I got my equation down to

a= ML / [2(1/3 M L ^2)]
How did you arrive at your torque equation, Ia = ML/2? The units aren't correct.

I think you'll first want to investigate the moment of inertia ##I## of a slender rod pivoted about an end. Then consider the torque on the rod at the instant it's horizontal.

[edit: Ah! Beaten to the punch by SammyS!]
 
gneill said:
Hello trojan15, Welcome to Physics Forums.How did you arrive at your torque equation, Ia = ML/2? The units aren't correct.

I think you'll first want to investigate the moment of inertia ##I## of a slender rod pivoted about an end. Then consider the torque on the rod at the instant it's horizontal.

[edit: Ah! Beaten to the punch by SammyS!]
So I went back and examined where I went wrong, however, I hit another snag.
So I did a= torque/Inertia, which got me to:a= rF/ [1/3 ML ^2]

a= maF/ 1/3ML^2

and then I get stuck because I have an acceleration value on both sides, and I feel like I'm going in the wrong direction
 
What force is causing the torque on the rod?
 
So I went back and examined where I went wrong, however, I hit another snag.
So I did a= torque/Inertia, which got me to:a= rF/ [1/3 ML ^2]

a= maF/ 1/3ML^2

and then I get stuck because I have an acceleration value on both sides, and I feel like I'm going in the wrong direction
 
trojan15 said:
So I went back and examined where I went wrong, however, I hit another snag.
So I did a= torque/Inertia, which got me to:a= rF/ [1/3 ML ^2]

a= maF/ 1/3ML^2

and then I get stuck because I have an acceleration value on both sides, and I feel like I'm going in the wrong direction
Are you saying that r = ma ? Surely not.

Let's go back to your original post:
trojan15 said:
I started with torque → Ia = ML/2
That has an error in it.

What is the force which pulls down on the rod (thus providing the torque) ?
 
SammyS said:
Are you saying that r = ma ? Surely not.

Let's go back to your original post:

That has an error in it.

What is the force which pulls down on the rod (thus providing the torque) ?
I realized the ML/2 part was wrong, and instead substituted
a= ML / [2(1/3 M L ^2)]
is this even the right step?
 
trojan15 said:
I realized the ML/2 part was wrong, and instead substituted
a= ML / [2(1/3 M L ^2)]
is this even the right step?
Simply answer this question.

What force produces the torque? Don't even give a formula, just name it.
 
  • #10
SammyS said:
Simply answer this question.

What force produces the torque? Don't even give a formula, just name it.

The rod rotating?
 
  • #11
trojan15 said:
The rod rotating?
That's not a force.

Let's change the starting conditions.

Suppose the rod were to start in a horizontal position. What force would cause the rod to move downward?
 
  • #12
SammyS said:
That's not a force.

Let's change the starting conditions.

Suppose the rod were to start in a horizontal position. What force would cause the rod to move downward?
gravity!
 
  • #13
trojan15 said:
gravity!
Correct.

What force does gravity exert on the rod? (Now write an expression which includes the mass, M, of the rod.)
 
Back
Top