Uranium 235 over Polonium 210 in Nuclear Plants?

AI Thread Summary
Polonium-210 is highly radioactive but is not used in nuclear plants or bombs because it is not a fissile isotope, meaning it cannot sustain a fission reaction. Nuclear power relies on isotopes like uranium-235 and plutonium-239, which can easily undergo fission when struck by slow neutrons. Polonium-210 lacks the necessary properties for a self-sustaining fission reaction and would require excessive energy input to induce fission without yielding significant energy output. Additionally, there is no large-scale source of Polonium-210 available for such applications. Therefore, uranium-235 and plutonium-239 remain the preferred choices for nuclear energy and weaponry.
Physics-GEEK
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
I was researching on radioactive elements and found out that polonium is the most radioactive element and the most radioactive isotope of polonium (out of 33!) is polonium 210. So I was wondering why it isn't used in nuclear plants and bombs. I know that if a slow neutron was to hit uranium 235 or plutonium 239, it would cause a fission reaction and one of the main reasons for this is because uranium and plutonium are radioactive and have a high fission probability. But if polonium is more radioactive, shouldn't it produce more energy from a fission reaction and therefore cause much more damage (in the case of a nuclear bomb) and create much more energy (in the case of a nuclear power plant) than uranium-235 or plutonium 239? And if so, why don't they use polonium 210 in nuclear bombs and plants? And if not, why?
Thanks in advance!
 
  • Like
Likes TheNeutrino
Engineering news on Phys.org
Physics-GEEK said:
found out that polonium is the most radioactive element
That statement does not make sense. Every element has isotopes with different lifetimes (some also have stable isotopes). Polonium-210 has a long lifetime compared to many other polonium isotopes.

Nuclear power plants use fission, the splitting of nuclei into two (sometimes three) smaller nuclei. They need isotopes that can undergo fission. Polonium-210 cannot. This has nothing to do with radioactivity.
There is also no large-scale source of Polonium-210.
 
  • Like
Likes TheNeutrino
Ok thanks so much. I never knew that Polonium 210 wasn't a fissile isotope so thanks for clarifying.
 
Any atom of sufficient size and instability can be made to fission if hit with enough energy. But the goal of using fission to create power is to create a self sustaining reaction. This requires the isotope to be fissile, meaning the isotope already wants to fall apart, you basically just have to touch it to get it going. Something like Po-210, you would put a ton of energy into get it to fission but you wouldn't get much energy out of it.

Fissile materials are U-233, U-235 and Pu-239.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top