Use the second shifting theorem to find the Laplace transform

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Laplace transform of a piecewise function defined as f(t) = {t^2, t<4; t, t≥4}, utilizing the second shifting theorem. The original poster is attempting to manipulate the function into the appropriate form for applying the theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express the function using the unit step function but becomes confused about the correct form. They consider completing the square but are unsure if that is necessary. Other participants question the correctness of the original poster's expression and suggest focusing on the requirements for g(t1) in relation to g(t-a).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's attempts and clarifying aspects of the problem. There is no explicit consensus yet, but some guidance has been offered regarding the form of the function and the application of the theorem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the expression for f(t) and a reminder about forum etiquette concerning posting similar questions in multiple threads.

Rubik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use the second shifting theorem to find the Laplace transform of

f(t) = {t2, t<4
{t, t[itex]\geq[/itex]4

Homework Equations



L{f(t - a)u(t - a)} = e-as F(s)

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I applied the unit step function to get the equation into the form
f(t) = t2 - t2(u)(t - 4) + t(u)(t - 4)
= t2(1 -u(t - 4) + t(u)(t - 4))

However now I get lost as I know it needs to be in the form f(t - a)u(t - a) and I see that the second part of equation is but the first part is confusing me I think maybe I am suppose to complete the square though I just can't see how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've missplaced a parenthesis. There should be no t^3 power in your expression for f(t).

Anyway, you don't need to complete the square; that would not be appropriate. Think about what g(t1) needs to be so that g(t-a) = t2.
 
Sorry but I am still not sure what to do with the t2 but with my second term, t2(u)(t - 4) is right to do this..

L{t2(u)(t - 4)
= t2 8t +16 - 8t - 16
= (t - 4)2 + 8t - 16)(u)(t - 4)
= ((t - 4)2 _ 8(t - 4) + 16)(u)(t - 4)
= (2/s3 + 8/s2 and here I am not sure what 16 becomes?)e-4s
 
Sorry I posted this before than saw you reply in my other thread so replied with the example I was working with.. should I have linked you to this thread instead is that still okay?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K