I Using AI for Gravitational Wave Generation

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! Can someone point me towards some papers that use AI for gravitational wave generation? I found many papers using AI to analyze data, but not really something where AI is used to actually generate waveforms. For example this was done for particle physics simulations to increase the speed by a few orders of magnitude (at some loss in accuracy), so given that a GW simulation takes a few weeks (based on SXS data), I assume this would be a good place to try AI simulations (I know there are some non-AI based codes out there providing simulations, but I am interested in codes using AI). By AI I mean deep neural networks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how AI would be helpful in creating NEW waveforms as I believe it would most likely overfit to whatever data you train it on? So, maybe you could use AI to help decide which waveform would be best given a bunch of them (outside of what is being used right now, since ML is being used in GW stuff).

The closest paper that I know of that would do this would be: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.10986.pdf
It might be a good place to start, but I don't think AI/Machine Learning can really do what you ask, but I've only dabbled in it.
 
romsofia said:
I don't see how AI would be helpful in creating NEW waveforms as I believe it would most likely overfit to whatever data you train it on? So, maybe you could use AI to help decide which waveform would be best given a bunch of them (outside of what is being used right now, since ML is being used in GW stuff).

The closest paper that I know of that would do this would be: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.10986.pdf
It might be a good place to start, but I don't think AI/Machine Learning can really do what you ask, but I've only dabbled in it.
I will look over that paper, but AI can certainly do that. As I said there are lots of papers used for particle physics simulations (jets for example at LHC using GANs) and obviously they are not just reproducing already existing simulations, but interpolating among them and hence creating new event topologies much faster. So I see no reason why this can't be done for GW.
 
kelly0303 said:
I will look over that paper, but AI can certainly do that. As I said there are lots of papers used for particle physics simulations (jets for example at LHC using GANs) and obviously they are not just reproducing already existing simulations, but interpolating among them and hence creating new event topologies much faster. So I see no reason why this can't be done for GW.
I'm not sure about particle physics simulations because that isn't my field, so I'd have to see if there are any similarities.

Waveforms are already generated via algorithms for the most (as stated in the paper), and yes, i was being dramatic that ML can't be used, but at the current point, I see no reason why it'd be mainstream. They do talk about using machine learning for it in the paper as well, but I haven't seen any development on the techniques, but hopefully that paper sets you off in the right direction!

Good luck.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top