Using Angles to Solve Force Component Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Muffin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Component
AI Thread Summary
To solve force component problems using angles, it's essential to understand how to apply the given angle, such as β, to find vertical and horizontal components. The discussion highlights the confusion around using the corresponding angles postulate and the need for clarity in visualizing the angles involved. A geometry theorem is referenced, indicating that two angles with mutually perpendicular sides are equal, which aids in understanding the relationship between the forces and the angle. The user expresses gratitude after gaining insight into the problem. Mastering these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating force components in physics.
Muffin
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi! I reallyreallyreally need ur help with this.

ex.1
XBdOE.jpg

To find the vertical and horizontal components of the force mg, I need to use the given angle \beta. The problem is I don't know how to use it. I have tried to use the corresponding angles postulate. But I can't make it to work. How should I think to find the components?

ex2.
UDqa8l.jpg

Its the same thing here. I don't know how to think so I can use the given angle \beta to calculate the components of mg.

Im sorry for my bad english but I hope you will understand what I want to ask.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Muffin and welcome to PF.

There is a geometry theorem that says that two angles that have their sides mutually perpendicular are equal. Do you see two lines that are mutually perpendicular to the sides that form the given angle β?
 
I think I understand now. Thank you so much!:smile:
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Force pulling on a string at an angle with a block at the other end
Replies
2
Views
1K
Calculate electric force using Coulomb's law (vector components are the struggle)
Replies
3
Views
1K
A moving boat with a flag on its mast
Replies
15
Views
903
Compton Scattering - Find x component of electron momentum
Replies
3
Views
2K
Correct approach in resolving a force into its different components
Replies
4
Views
1K
Torque biomechanics
Replies
6
Views
1K
How do you find the initial velocity of a projectile given angle/distance?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Rope between inclines with maximum length of hanging middle portion
Replies
46
Views
2K
The Relationship Between Masses and Angles in a Pulley System
Replies
29
Views
3K
Forces: find angle without x/y components?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top