Other Using Databases like Scopus to Find Trends in Physics

AI Thread Summary
To determine the current "hot" areas of physics using databases like Scopus, it is essential to clarify what "hot" and "still in development" mean. "Hot" refers to trending fields with significant research activity, while "still in development" indicates areas that are emerging or evolving. The identification of important fields can depend on various factors, including the number of researchers, the volume of published articles, and funding opportunities from prestigious institutions. For insights into what physicists find exciting, resources like the American Physical Society's highlighted research can be useful. The discussion emphasizes that the perceived heat of a field can vary based on the granularity of the subfields, illustrating that broader categories may appear more active than their specific subfields.
rsnelsonjose
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. My question is how can I use databases like scopus to know which areas of physics are the "hot" today or which are still in development.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Define "hot" and "still in development". Or, asked differently, which area is not studied any more?
 
No no I've been looking for the most important fields of physics in the last decade, but I want to be sure using databases. Thats why I said "hot"...meaning "trend in the present"
 
Now define "most important" :smile:

The point being that the answer you get will depend a lot on the exact question you ask. Is it the number of people working in the field? The number of articles in Phys. Rev. Lett.? How much money [big name university] is willing to put to recruit a leader in the field?

If you want to get an idea of what physicists themselves think is exciting, I suggest you look at the research highlighted at
https://physics.aps.org
 
If we go purely by number of people working on it then every field is hotter than each of its subfields.
"Nuclear and particle physics" might be hotter than laser physics, but laser physics could be hotter than both nuclear physics and particle physics. Until you split laser physics into solid-state lasers and other lasers, then you get the reverse order again. Made-up example, but it should demonstrate the problem.
 
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top