Using field axioms to prove a set is not a field

  • Thread starter Thread starter notnottrue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms Field Set
notnottrue
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let F = {a + b\sqrt[3]{2}:a,b\inQ}.
Using the fact that \sqrt[3]{2} is irrational, show that F is not a field.

[Hint: What is the inverse of \sqrt[3]{2} under multiplication?]


Homework Equations



For a field,
For all c \in F, there exists c-1 \in F s.t. c*c-1 =1

The Attempt at a Solution



I am unsure how to relate the axioms to the set. Is c = (a +b\sqrt[3]{2})?
Or show there is no b\sqrt[3]{2}*b-1\sqrt[3]{2}=1?
Or b\sqrt[3]{2}*(b\sqrt[3]{2})-1=1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are lots of ways to go about it, but if you're going to follow the hint, it specifically suggests showing that \sqrt[3]{2} is an element that doesn't have an inverse.
 
\sqrt[3]{2}\inF with a=0 and b=1
So there must be c such that c*\sqrt[3]{2}=1
c=1/\sqrt[3]{2}\notinQ
Since \sqrt[3]{2}\inF, F must not be a field because it has no inverse under multiplication.
Is this sound?
 
Last edited:
Bumb
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top