Using Graph to determine constants in equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter yardy_genius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Graph
AI Thread Summary
To determine the constants k and n in the equation F = x + kx^n, the correct approach involves using logarithmic transformations. The initial assumption that log(F) can be expressed as the sum of logs is incorrect; instead, log(F - x) should be used. By plotting log(F - x) against log(x), a straight line will emerge, where the y-intercept represents log(k) and the slope corresponds to n. This method allows for accurate calculation of both constants k and n. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper logarithmic manipulation in mathematical modeling.
yardy_genius
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hello,

i have the equation F= x + kx^n

I am trying to determine the constants k and n? where i have the ranges for F and x

is what i am doing correct?

log F= logx + logk+ nlogx

log F= logx(1+n) + logk


ok i would then plot logF vs Log x. if i am correct logk = y intercept and from that k can be calculated. How would i use the gradient to find the value of n. can someone please give me some assistance. much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yardy_genius said:
Hello,

i have the equation F= x + kx^n

I am trying to determine the constants k and n? where i have the ranges for F and x

is what i am doing correct?

log F= logx + logk+ nlogx
No, it is WRONG... log(a+b) is not equal to log(a )+ log(b)

But log(F-x)=log(kx^n)= logk+n logx.

Plot out log(F-x) in terms of logx. It has to be a straight line, with y-intercept logk and slope n.

ehild
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
No, it is WRONG... log(a+b) is not equal to log(a )+ log(b)

But log(F-x)=log(kx^n)= logk+n logx.

Plot out log(F-x) in terms of logx. It has to be a straight line, with y-intercept logk and slope n.

ehild

thank you very much for that correction!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top