Using Maclaurin series to find 2005-order derivative

hqjb
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f(x) = \arctan(\frac{1+x}{1-x})
Find f^{2005}(0)

Homework Equations



I'm guessing this has to do with maclaurin's?

The Attempt at a Solution


...
<br /> f(x) = \pi /4 + \sum^∞_{n = 0} \frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}x^{2n+1}<br />

\sum^∞_{n = 0}\frac{f^n(0)x^n}{n!} = \pi /4 + \sum^∞_{n = 0} \frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}x^{2n+1}

So anyone knows how I go about from here? The answer is 2004!(factorial)
How do you compare two infinite series can you cancel them out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(d/dx)xn = nxn-1

(dp/dxp) xn = n!/(n-p)! xn-p
(can you see where this formula comes from?)

Also, (d/dx)C=0

They want the value of the 2005th derivative at 0. If you think about it, the term involving x2005 will become a constant after 2005 differentiations. All terms before x2005 will disappear due to (d/dx)C=0, and all terms after are irrelevant since we are calculating at 0.

The term at x2005 is supplied by the formula you found:

Ʃ (-1)n/(2n+1) x2n+1

Of course, the π/4 term also disappears.
 
Last edited:
You can compare the two series since they are polynomials in x, and what you are interested in is only one of the terms of the polynomial. f^(2000) occurs exactly in the term of x^(2005), so you can ignore all other terms and compare the coefficients of x^2005 on both sides.
 
Harrisonized said:
(d/dx)xn = nxn-1

(dp/dxp) xn = n!/(n-p)! xn-p
(can you see where this formula comes from?)

Also, (d/dx)C=0

They want the value of the 2005th derivative at 0. If you think about it, the term involving x2005 will become a constant after 2005 differentiations. All terms before x2005 will disappear due to (d/dx)C=0, and all terms after are irrelevant since we are calculating at 0.

The term at x2005 is supplied by the formula you found:

Ʃ (-1)n/(2n+1) x2n+1

Of course, the π/4 term also disappears.

lol_nl said:
You can compare the two series since they are polynomials in x, and what you are interested in is only one of the terms of the polynomial. f^(2000) occurs exactly in the term of x^(2005), so you can ignore all other terms and compare the coefficients of x^2005 on both sides.

Ah...i get it now so,
f^{2005}(0)=\frac{2005!}{2005} * (-1)^{1002}

Thanks for your help!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top