Using Newtons law and mechanical energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying conservation of mechanical energy to determine the speed of a car rolling down a 9.9-degree ramp without friction. The initial height is incorrectly assumed to be 52 m, which is actually the distance traveled along the ramp, not the vertical height. Participants emphasize the importance of calculating the change in height (Δh) using the ramp's angle and the distance traveled. A free body diagram is suggested to clarify the relationship between the ramp distance and vertical height. Correctly identifying Δh is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
jimmyboykun
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [/b]
A car is rolling down a ramp that is inclined at and angle of 9.9 degree with respect to horizontal. There is no friction acting from the road on the tires.


Employ conservation of mechanical energy to find the speed of a car that starts from rest and rolls down the ramp a distance of 52 m.

2. Homework Equations [/b]

1/2mv(initial)^2+mgh(initial)=1/2mv(final)^2+mgh(final)


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b]
Vi=0m/s
Vf=?
hi=52m
hf=0

52mg=1/2vf

2*52m*9.81m/s^2=vf

√1020.24m^2s^2=√v

31.94m/s=v

I got a 1 out of ten in this problem. most likely got the units right, but my math did I used the right equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The initial height is not 52 m. Draw a diagram to see why this is the case.
 
subzero0137 said:
The initial height is not 52 m. Draw a diagram to see why this is the case.

ok I drew the free body diagram initial height is not 52m. would the 52 m be considered Δh?
 
Not quite - 52m is the distance the car travels down the ramp. It's change in height is not equal to this distance because this distance is composed of both the x and y distances. :)
 
Tsunoyukami said:
Not quite - 52m is the distance the car travels down the ramp. It's change in height is not equal to this distance because this distance is composed of both the x and y distances. :)

ok in this equation, where would the 52 m be placed, or am I using the proper equation for mechanical energy?
 
jimmyboykun said:
ok I drew the free body diagram initial height is not 52m. would the 52 m be considered Δh?

No.
HINT: You have to use the value of the angle of the ramp and 52 m to get your Δh.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top