Using nuclear shell model to determine parity and spin

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the parity and spin assignments for stable isotopes of calcium, specifically addressing the isotopes 40Ca, 42Ca, 43Ca, 44Ca, 46Ca, and 48Ca. Most isotopes are classified as even-even, resulting in a spin of 0 and even parity, while the spin and parity of 43Ca require further analysis due to its odd number of neutrons. The conversation highlights the importance of identifying the shell in which the unpaired neutron resides, with the 1f7/2 shell being identified for 43Ca. The calculated spin for this neutron is j = 7/2 and its parity is odd. The discussion concludes with confirmation of the calculations and the suggestion to verify results against existing nuclear data.
Flucky
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Use the shell model to determine the parity and spin assignments for all the stable isotopes of calcium.

Homework Equations


n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


The stable isotopes seem to be 40Ca, 42Ca, 43Ca, 44Ca, 46Ca, and 48Ca

I believe all of those isotopes except 43Ca are even-even which means that they have spin=0 and parity=even, however I'm a bit stuck on how to work out the spin and parity of 43Ca.

There are 23 neutrons, so 20 of those fill up the shells to the magic number (20) and we have 3 left over.

How do I work out the orbital angular momentum l and j-value of those?

With these values I could work out the spin of the unpaired nucleon (which would be the j-value) and its parity (-1)l
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Flucky said:
I believe all of those isotopes except 43Ca are even-even which means that they have spin=0 and parity=even

Yes.

Flucky said:
There are 23 neutrons, so 20 of those fill up the shells to the magic number (20) and we have 3 left over.

How do I work out the orbital angular momentum l and j-value of those?

With these values I could work out the spin of the unpaired nucleon (which would be the j-value) and its parity (-1)l

You're almost there - you clearly know that paired nucleons will couple to 0+ in the lowest energy, since you know what the GS spin and parity is for even-even nuclei. Then, you know that you only have one neutron left over that you need to worry about. Now, to work out the spin and parity, you need to know what shell it will sit in.

I don't know where in learning about the shell model you are. Have you come across this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e5/Shells.png/220px-Shells.png sort of diagram? Or have you gotten to the Nilsson diagram? http://ie.lbl.gov/toipdf/nilsson.pdf. As 43Ca will be very close to spherical, either will work to answer the question.
 
e.bar.goum said:
I don't know where in learning about the shell model you are. Have you come across this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e5/Shells.png/220px-Shells.png sort of diagram? Or have you gotten to the Nilsson diagram? http://ie.lbl.gov/toipdf/nilsson.pdf. As 43Ca will be very close to spherical, either will work to answer the question.

I'm pretty sure we'd only be working with the first one, the Nilsson diagram looks more advanced.

Going off the first diagram it looks like our lone neutron would be in the 1f\frac{7}{2} shell where nuclear spin j = \frac{7}{2} and parity = (-1)3 [to the power 3 because it is in the f shell] = -1 = odd?
 
Flucky said:
I'm pretty sure we'd only be working with the first one, the Nilsson diagram looks more advanced.

The Nilsson diagram becomes important if you want to talk about deformed nuclei. If you look at the center line of the Nilsson diagram, you'll see that it's the same as the first diagram.

Flucky said:
Going off the first diagram it looks like our lone neutron would be in the 1f\frac{7}{2} shell where nuclear spin j = \frac{7}{2} and parity = (-1)3 [to the power 3 because it is in the f shell] = -1 = odd?

##\frac{7}{2}^-## -- You've got it! You can always check your answer by looking at the data for nuclei. Here's a good place to look. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/chartNuc.jsp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
e.bar.goum said:
##\frac{7}{2}^-## -- You've got it! You can always check your answer by looking at the data for nuclei. Here's a good place to look. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/chartNuc.jsp

Great, thanks for the help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes e.bar.goum
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top