Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Using parallax and magnitudes.

  1. May 6, 2009 #1

    C.E

    User Avatar

    Hi, I am quite new to astronomy and was wondering whether I had done the following question correctly (some of my answers seem unrealistic). Plus, how many significant figures should questions like these be answered to?

    The star Rigel in the constellation of Orion has an apparent magnitude of 0.1 mag,
    its parallax is 4.22 milli-arc seconds (mas). Betelgeuse, also in Orion, has an
    apparent magnitude of 0.58 mag and a parallax of 7.63mas.

    (i) Compute the distance from Earth to Rigel and Betelgeuse.

    my attempt: distance to Rigel= 1/(4.22 x 10^-3) = 237 pc

    distance to Betelgeuse = 1/(7.63 x 10^-3) = 131 pc

    (ii) Using the above information, compute the absolute magnitude of both stars.
    Which star has the higher luminosity?

    I used M=m- 5log(d/10)

    For Rigel M=0.1-5log(23.7)= -6.77 (this seems too low to me).

    For Betelgeuse M=0.58 - 5log(13.1)=-5.0 (again I was not expecting a value this low)

    Hence Rigel is brightest.

    (iii) The Sun has an absolute magnitude of 4.83 mag. Determine the luminosity of
    Rigel in solar luminosities.

    L=L(sun)10^(M(sun)-M(R))/2.5 so L= 43700 L(sun) (again this does not seem realistic to me).

    Any ideas?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 7, 2009 #2

    Ich

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yes: Wikipedia. Your answer seems to be correct.
    BTW, there's a special homework section.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Using parallax and magnitudes.
  1. Parallax error (Replies: 1)

  2. Parallax method (Replies: 6)

  3. Parallax and distance (Replies: 3)

Loading...