Using the normalise wavefunction, calculate momentum squared

AStaunton
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
[problem is:

the wavefunction for a particle in a stationary state of a one dimensional infinite potential well is given by:

\Psi_{1}(x,t)=A\cos(\frac{\pi x}{2a})e^{-i\frac{Et}{\hbar}} for -a\leq x\leq a

= 0 otherwise.

using the normalised wavefunction calculate the expectation value of momentum squared:

\langle p^{2}\rangle


My attemted solution:

i know that to find momentum p, the operator is:

\bar{p}=-\hbar\bar{\nabla}^{2}

so we say:

\langle p\rangle=\int\Psi^{\star}\bar{p}\Psi dx

is it simply a matter of squaring p at this stage to get p^2?

Also, it says to use the normalised wave function, have I done this already in my integration step or is there something else needs be done?

Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just square the momentum operator first, then integrate between the two Psi's (I'm completely new to this forum, so I can't write tex code yet. bear with me)
 
in terms of squaring the momentum operator, who is this done?

ie...the first part simple goes to (i^2hbar^2) but what does it mean to square the laplacian?
 
In position representation (one dimension), the momentum operator

\hat{P}\rightarrow-i\hbar\dfrac{d}{dx}.

You want to square this. Squaring a derivative operator just turns it into a second derivative. The process is then taking

\langle\hat{P}^2\rangle=\langle\Psi_1|\hat{P}^2|\Psi_1\rangle.

As for the normalization condition, what they want you to do is first normalize the wave function, i.e. solve for A such that

\langle\Psi_1|\Psi_1\rangle=1.

Sometimes an even easier way of taking <P^2> is to let one P operate on \langle\psi| and the other on |\psi\rangle so that you only have to work with first derivatives. In this case it won't make much of a difference, but it is a nice trick to have up your sleeve.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top