Using the path equation to determine the path of a satellite

HMPARTICLE
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
A satellite is in a circular orbit a distance $h$ above the surface of the Earth with speed $v_0$. It suffers a head-on collision with some debris which reduces its speed to $kv_0$, where $k$ is a constant in the range $0<k<1$, but does not change its direction. Calculate the eccentricity of the new orbit.We assume that the satellite is being acted on by an attractive inverse square force.

Now before the collision we have
$$\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2}+u=\frac{\gamma}{L^2}\implies\frac{1}{R} = \frac{\gamma}{R^2 v_0^2} \implies \gamma = Rv_0^2$$

After the collision, $\gamma$ is unchanged, but the angular momentum is.
We shall denote that by $L'$. how do I progress from here? Because I don't know how the magnitude of the angular component of the velocity has changed. What is L'?

Would it be correct to say after the collision $L' = kRv_0$? I feel this is not correct.

I am unsure how to use inline latex on here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HMPARTICLE said:
A satellite is in a circular orbit a distance ##h## above the surface of the Earth with speed ##v_0##. It suffers a head-on collision with some debris which reduces its speed to ##kv_0##, where ##k## is a constant in the range ##0<k<1##, but does not change its direction. Calculate the eccentricity of the new orbit.We assume that the satellite is being acted on by an attractive inverse square force.

Now before the collision we have
$$\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2}+u=\frac{\gamma}{L^2}\implies\frac{1}{R} = \frac{\gamma}{R^2 v_0^2} \implies \gamma = Rv_0^2$$

After the collision, ##\gamma## is unchanged, but the angular momentum is.
We shall denote that by ##L'##. how do I progress from here? Because I don't know how the magnitude of the angular component of the velocity has changed. What is L'?

Would it be correct to say after the collision ##L' = kRv_0##? I feel this is not correct.

I am unsure how to use inline latex on here.

To use inline Latex, put '##' before and after your expressions.

You can always check formatting before you post by hitting the Preview button located next to the Post Reply.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top