Vacuum vs. Compression: Which Requires More Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter violin_writer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compression Vacuum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy requirements for decompressing air to create a vacuum versus compressing air. Participants highlight that pulling a vacuum is often more challenging due to the tendency of vacuum systems to leak. The energy needed for both processes can vary significantly based on specific parameters, such as the pressure levels involved. A practical example using a syringe illustrates that compressing air requires more work compared to pulling a vacuum. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the complexity and variability of energy requirements in both scenarios.
violin_writer
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I wander...
which would require more energy, to decompress air like a vacuum or compress air?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
How would you be able to decompress air to an absolute vacuum? And compress air up to what pressure?
 
"decompress air like a vacuum"

is a meaningless statement.
 
Yes, you'll need to be much more specific about what you are talking about. Do you have a specific scenario in mind?
 
Im assuming its a similar thing to pumping losses in an engine.]

i.e is it harder to compress air trapped in a cylinder, or to pull against a vacuum.
 
That's the way I read it. In reality, it is tougher to pull a vacuum because those systems are much more prone to leaking.
 
FredGarvin said:
That's the way I read it...
See, the problem here is that I read the same thing that Chris said and reach exactly the opposite conclusion! We need more info about what the OP is getting at. Anyway...
In reality, it is tougher to pull a vacuum because those systems are much more prone to leaking.
I wasn't thinking the OP really meant energy because in either case, energy could be infinite depending on what you are asking. Ie, since you can't generate a perfect vacuum, you would expend an infinite amount of energy in the attempt. At the same time, compressing air requires more and more energy as well and the OP didn't specify parameters. Here's what I thought of when I read the OP:

Consider a piston/cylinder arrangement, such as a syringe, 1/2" cross sectional area, 4" long. The syringe is half full of air at atmospheric pressure and is closed. How much energy is required to pull or push the piston 1" in either direction? Roughly:

Pulling on the syringe and moving it 1" would yield a minimum internal pressure of 7.4 psi, force of 3.7 lb, and work of 1.8 inch-pounds. In fact, the maximum possible force you could generate with such a syringe in "vacuum pump mode" is 7.4 lb, which limits the amount of work requried to move the piston. Not so in "compressor mode":

Working as a compressor, pushing it 1" yields a pressure of 14.7 psi, a force of 7.4 lb, and requires a work of 3.7 in-lb.
 
hi i know what you mean, whilst i was with edwards vcauum when we used to un the vacuum pump and test the current drawn ,,oncea hard vacuum is reached say.005 mbar vacuum the level of current amps to hold this pressure is qyuite low in compairiosn to an industrial compressor..but its not really relative unless you wre talking absolute compression and absolute vacuum as there are way too many variables
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top