Valence States of Chromium and Silver in Net Ionic Equations: Which One to Use?

  • Thread starter Thread starter greg153
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    State
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the appropriate valence state of chromium (Cr) when writing a net ionic equation with silver nitrate. Users suggest using Cr in the +3 oxidation state due to its favorable half-reaction potential compared to +2. The conversation also touches on the activity series, concluding that no reactions would occur for gold with hydrochloric acid and nickel with calcium acetate, as both metals are less reactive than the elements they are paired with. The importance of comparing half-reaction potentials and the activity series is emphasized for predicting reaction feasibility. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately writing net ionic equations.
greg153
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to write a net ionic equation for Cr and silver nitrate, but I am confused on which valence state to use, since Cr has multiple valence states ie +2, +3 and + 6.2. The attempt at a solution
If I use the valence state of +2 I end up with:
Cr(s) + 2 Ag+(aq) = 2 Ag (s) + Cr2+(aq)

But if I use +3 I end up with:
Cr(s) + 3Ag+(aq) -> 3Ag(s) + Cr3+(aq)

So which one do I use? and is there a rule to follow?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general you should compare potentials of half reactions. In this case go for Cr3+.
 
Borek said:
In general you should compare potentials of half reactions. In this case go for Cr3+.

Thanks borek. :)

Another quick question. Neither of these reactions would occur correct?

1.Au + HCl
No reaction since Au is below H2 in the activity series.

2.Ni + Ca(C2H3O2)2 (Ca acetate)
No reaction since Ni is below Ca in the activity series.
 
2xOK
 
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top